Jonathan Kuminga Still Faces The Warriors Question In Minnesota

Can Jonathan Kuminga transform his 3-point shooting to elevate the Timberwolves' championship aspirations where the Warriors found limitations?

The Minnesota Timberwolves are betting big on Jonathan Kuminga, and the pitch to the former Golden State Warriors forward is clear: come in, start right away, and help a team chasing championship contention.

That opportunity comes with a catch. For this move to really work, Kuminga has to become something the Warriors never got consistently - a dependable 3-point shooter and catch-and-shoot threat.

That was part of the story in Golden State for nearly five years. Kuminga’s role bounced around because the shot never settled in.

Now Minnesota is asking for more, and the timing matters. He’s 23, and the Timberwolves are giving him a starting spot, but that only holds if he can stretch the floor.

The fit is complicated by who’s already in the lineup. Kuminga is set to play alongside Rudy Gobert at the five, which should help him on defense.

He may be able to play more aggressively and chase opponents around the perimeter. But on offense, the spacing problem is obvious.

Gobert is essentially a non-factor from beyond the restricted circle, so Minnesota can’t afford to stack the floor with another player defenses ignore from deep. Chris Finch and the Timberwolves are not going to want two guys on the floor who opponents don’t respect from 3-point range. If that becomes the reality, Kuminga could find himself sitting in big moments and late-game situations.

His career numbers don’t exactly scream certainty. Kuminga has shot 33.2% from 3-point range overall, and he’s been under 34% in four of his five seasons. The lone exception came in his second year, when he hit 37%.

He did flash early last season, opening with a 4-of-6 night from deep against the Los Angeles Lakers. But the touch didn’t hold. By the time he was traded to the Atlanta Hawks in February, he had settled at 32.1% from 3.

Minnesota also loses a helpful piece of its own spacing puzzle. The Timberwolves no longer have the option of swapping Gobert for Naz Reid, a combination that would have fit Kuminga better offensively, even if it would have cost them on defense.

The broader team context only adds more pressure. Minnesota finished sixth in 3-point percentage last season and will want to stay near that level. That task gets tougher without injured former Warrior Donte DiVincenzo, who hit 37.9% from deep on nearly eight attempts per game and was their highest-volume shooter after Anthony Edwards.

In the end, Kuminga’s minutes will come down to one thing: whether the shot is good enough. Ayo Dosunmu, who shot 41.4% from 3 with the Timberwolves last season, and Terrence Shannon Jr., who shot 40.8%, are projected bench players, but either could end up playing more than Kuminga if his 3-ball doesn’t at least get to league average, around 35-36%.

The history says that’s a tall ask. But if Kuminga is going to make this Timberwolves run work - and boost his value before another possible trip to free agency next year - he’s going to have to beat it.

In Other News...

Warriors Keep Betting On A Risky Formula Fans Know Too Well

The Warriors have spent the offseason leaning into a familiar kind of roster bet, doubling down on veteran talent even when the injury history comes attached. Re-signing older pieces like Al Horford, Kristaps Porzingis, Draymond Green and Gary Payton II fits a pattern Golden State has been willing to live with for years, trusting experience, defensive versatility and playoff familiarity over cleaner health projections.

Ben Simmons was part of that same thought process before he landed with the Sacramento Kings, and it points to how the Warriors continue to view this stage of team building. The same logic could carry into the midseason trade market, where Golden State may again be drawn to established names with baggage, keeping the door open to another high-risk, high-reward swing if the right opportunity comes along. [Read more 🡒]

Warriors Could Make A Risky Pelicans Bet Fans Didn't Expect

The Warriors are again being linked to New Orleans, this time with two very different Pelicans names sitting in the conversation. Trey Murphy III offers the kind of long-term shooting and versatility Golden State always likes to imagine in its system, while Zion Williamson brings a far bigger swing of talent and uncertainty. For a team that has spent recent years trying to balance urgency with caution, the mere fact that Williamson is being discussed as a possible fit says plenty about how aggressively the front office may be willing to shop.

Golden States trade philosophy has not exactly been built around taking the safest route, especially when a star-level talent becomes available. The challenge here is obvious: Williamsons upside is enormous, but his injury history makes any deal tricky, and the Warriors have been careful about how they deploy draft capital. Even so, the idea of the Warriors poking around on a Pelicans centerpiece is the kind of rumor that lingers, because it feels both improbable and, in the right circumstances, very much in their range of thinking. [Read more 🡒]

Warriors Still Havent Escaped The Pain Of This Infamous Celtics Trade

Long before the Warriors became a modern force, they made one of the franchises most painful draft-night decisions. In the lead-up to the 1980 NBA Draft, Golden State had a chance to reshape its future, moving off Robert Parish and another valuable pick in a deal that was supposed to bring back the kind of top-end talent a team could build around. Instead, the transaction became a cautionary tale that still hangs over the organization.

Golden State used its new selections on Joe Barry Carroll and Rickey Brown, while the Celtics found their own answer with a player who would become one of the defining names of that era. Parish and that Celtics draft choice went on to anchor Boston for years, and the Warriors spent the next six seasons outside the playoffs. Even decades later, the trade remains one of those reminders that a draft-day swing can change the course of two franchises in opposite directions. [Read more 🡒]