On July 13, 2026, the NHL trade chatter centered on three very different situations: Connor McDavid’s scoring ceiling under Mike Babcock, the steady drumbeat of calls around Arber Xhekaj in Montreal, and a new wrinkle in the Connor Hellebuyck sweepstakes that could pull the San Jose Sharks into the mix.
The McDavid discussion starts with the obvious truth: he’s still going to produce. The question is whether Babcock’s more defensive, more structured approach could shave down the biggest point totals McDavid has posted in the past. In a system that asks for more two-way responsibility and less freedom to freelance, McDavid may not get quite as many of those premium offensive chances, especially at five-on-five, where he has often piled up some of his best numbers.
That doesn’t mean anyone is bracing for a down year. The expectation remains that McDavid will be excellent, and the extra games in the schedule could help keep the total climbing. The projection from the interview lands in the low-to-mid 130s, with 135 described as the realistic high end.
In Montreal, Xhekaj is drawing interest, and that part of the story makes sense. A big, physical defenseman who can protect teammates is the kind of player teams always ask about. The Canadiens don’t appear to be in a rush to move him, but the calls are coming in.
Jeff Gorton said the team is in normal contract discussions with Xhekaj, and that he has not filed for salary arbitration. That doesn’t sound like a situation on the verge of turning messy. At the same time, Kent Hughes has shown he won’t ignore the right offer if it comes along.
The Hellebuyck situation may be the most interesting of the bunch. Buffalo had been viewed as the obvious landing spot in the trade talk, but San Jose is now being mentioned as a real contender. The Sharks’ recent signing of goalie Eric Comrie is part of why the idea has gained traction.
The connection matters because Comrie has a history with Hellebuyck, and he has been described as Hellebuyck’s “personal security blanket” from their time together in Winnipeg. That kind of familiarity could make San Jose a more attractive destination. The timing and destination are still unsettled, but the Sharks have moved into the conversation, and Buffalo no longer looks like the only team in the frame.
In Other News...
Why Kapanens Oilers Fit Suddenly Feels A Lot More Real
Kasperi Kapanens return to Edmonton on a one-year, $2.6 million deal gives the Oilers another familiar piece for the bottom six, and it comes with a little more context than a routine depth signing. His history with Mike Babcock in Toronto matters here, because that was the stretch when Kapanen flashed the most complete version of his game and earned a bigger role than just a speed-and-skill winger.
The fit also feels more real because it is not just about what Kapanen has already done, but where the organizational overlap is headed. He is expected to reconnect with Babcock in the 2026-27 season, alongside other former Maple Leafs already in the mix, which gives this move a longer view than a simple one-year bet. For Edmonton, it is another sign that the roster is being built with some very specific familiarity in mind. [Read more 🡒]
Oilers Still Have One Roster Question Fans Can't Ignore
A cluster of recognizable names is still sitting on the NHL market, and that keeps the conversation alive for a team like Edmonton, which is always looking for another way to sharpen its attack. Anthony Mantha, Patrick Kane, Patrik Laine, Vladimir Tarasenko, Michael Bunting and Eeli Tolvanen all remain unsigned, giving the Oilers a menu of different skill sets to consider as they weigh how best to add scoring without disrupting the core.
Tarasenko stands out because he brings the kind of complementary offense and playoff seasoning that can fit beside elite talent without demanding a major commitment. Edmonton appears to be shopping for a quick fix rather than a long-term bet, which makes this a narrow search, and one that still leaves a familiar question hanging over the roster as the market keeps moving. [Read more 🡒]