Connor McDavid is still Connor McDavid, and nobody is seriously questioning whether he’ll remain one of the game’s elite scorers. The real conversation around the Oilers is a little more specific: if Mike Babcock brings a more structured approach to Edmonton, how much does that change McDavid’s point total?
That was the angle Mike Johnson and Jamie McLennan dug into with Aaron Korolnek on a recent TSN interview. The idea wasn’t that McDavid suddenly becomes less dangerous. It was that Babcock’s style could trim some of the runway that has helped fuel those outrageous offensive seasons.
Babcock has always been associated with structure, and that usually means a more organized, two-way commitment from his top players. In that kind of setup, stars don’t always get the same freedom to improvise in the offensive zone. The result could be fewer of those wide-open, high-end looks that turn McDavid nights into video-game stat lines.
Five-on-five play is part of that conversation too. So many of McDavid’s biggest point totals have come in those situations, and a more controlled system could mean more matchup management and less time in the easiest offensive spots depending on the opponent or the moment.
Still, nobody on the interview was talking about a collapse. This is Connor McDavid.
He’s going to generate offence because that’s what he does. The expectation is more that the ceiling may come down a notch - still huge, just not quite as sky-high as the absolute peak seasons.
There’s also a simple scheduling wrinkle in play. The season has extra games, and for a player like McDavid, a couple more nights on the calendar can matter. Even if his usage becomes a little more controlled, those added games can help push the total upward.
Johnson and McLennan put McDavid in the low-to-mid 130s, with a ceiling around 135. That’s an enormous number by any standard. It’s just not the kind of 150-point pace that suddenly feels likely with Babcock in charge.
And that’s really the point: if Edmonton buys into “the process” and the system makes the team better, McDavid can still be the engine. The numbers may not get quite as wild, but they’d still be right where only the very best players in the world live.
In Other News...
Patrick Kane Debate Just Got Real For Blackhawks Fans
Patrick Kane is still on the market after finishing last season with the Detroit Red Wings, and the conversation around his next stop has widened beyond the usual familiar names. For Edmonton, the appeal is pretty clear: the Oilers are built to chase a Stanley Cup right now, and a veteran scorer with Kanes track record would fit the kind of win-now push that has defined their roster planning.
What makes the discussion more interesting is how naturally Kane could slide into Edmontons lineup if the fit ever became real. The Oilers already have elite talent at the top, and adding another creative forward would give the coaching staff another dangerous option, even if it came with some ripple effects for younger players waiting for a bigger opportunity. For now, though, it remains exactly what it is in July - a possibility, not a decision. [Read more 🡒]
Connor McDavid Suddenly Faces A Real Concern Under Edmontons New Coach
Connor McDavids production is always the first thing people watch when the Oilers make a coaching change, and Mike Babcocks arrival has naturally sparked questions about whether a more disciplined, defense-first approach will alter the way Edmonton scores. McDavid has spent years operating in a system built to maximize his pace and creativity, so even a subtle shift in structure invites a new kind of scrutiny around just how high his point totals can climb.
The concern is not that McDavid will stop being McDavid, but that a tighter setup could shave a little off the ceiling that has made his seasons feel almost untouchable. In a market where every adjustment gets magnified, that makes the early read on Edmonton just as much about style as results, with the real test coming once the games start and the new look has to hold up against the leagues best. [Read more 🡒]