Kirill Marchenko’s name is already hanging over Columbus, and the chatter doesn’t look like it’s going anywhere soon.
The Blue Jackets winger didn’t exactly sound like someone eager to plant roots long-term when he recently spoke with the media, and that has only fueled the speculation around his future. There has been no official trade request from Marchenko, at least not publicly, but Sportsnet insider Nick Kypreos believes the 26-year-old wants out and says three Canadian clubs are lining up: the Toronto Maple Leafs, Edmonton Oilers and Montreal Canadiens.
“Kirill Marchenko, who desperately wants out of Columbus, should have an easier time doing so since he doesn’t have any trade protection on his contract, so it comes down to the Blue Jackets finding a deal they like. Furthermore, he’s a pending RFA with arbitration rights so a team trading for him won’t just be getting a one-year rental. Toronto, Edmonton and Montreal seem poised to try and make something work with Columbus,”
That contract situation matters. Marchenko is a pending restricted free agent and is heading into the third and final season of the three-year, $11.55 million extension he signed with Columbus in 2024. He also has arbitration rights, which makes him more than just a short-term pickup for any team willing to pay the price.
Last season, Marchenko put up 67 points in 76 games, scoring 27 goals and adding 40 assists.
Montreal has been tied to him for a while, so its presence in this conversation isn’t much of a surprise. Toronto and Edmonton are newer additions to the rumor mill, but both teams have kept room to chase a move like this if the right opportunity comes along, with GMs John Chayka and Stan Bowman staying flexible.
There’s no deadline forcing Don Waddell’s hand, but if Columbus stumbles out of the gate, the noise around Marchenko is only going to get louder. Zach Werenski would likely get pulled into that same conversation too.
And as the 2026-27 season gets underway, the spotlight around the Blue Jackets could be intense.
In Other News...
Messier Just Turned Up The Heat On Oilers' Babcock Debate
The Oilers decision to bring in Mike Babcock this summer already carried plenty of baggage, and Mark Messier has now poured more fuel on the debate. Edmonton turned to Babcock in June after moving on from Kris Knoblauch, a move that drew attention not just because of the coaching change, but because of Babcocks long and controversial track record around player treatment.
Messier publicly questioned the organizations judgment, saying he was stunned by the hire in light of the reports that have followed Babcock for years. The fact that Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl interviewed and backed the move only added another layer to the conversation, especially with the NHL having previously reviewed the situation and cleared Babcock before Edmonton made its call. [Read more 🡒]
Leo Carlsson Debate Just Put Ducks Leadership Under The Microscope
A broader debate around team authority has crept back into the conversation around the Oilers, and Mark Messier is adding his voice to it. The Hall of Famer took issue with the way Edmonton handled its coaching search, arguing that letting players carry so much weight in the process muddies the line between the locker room and the front office and can create problems the moment things go sideways.
The timing matters because Edmonton is trying to operate like a serious contender, which leaves little room for uncertainty about who makes the decisions. Messiers comments have revived a familiar question for the Oilers: how much influence should the core players have when the organization is making one of its biggest calls, and where does leadership start to blur into ownership? [Read more 🡒]
Messiers Oilers Blast Just Raised A Bigger Leadership Question
Mark Messiers latest blast landed with the kind of force only a former captain of his stature can generate, because it was aimed not at a bad shift or a rough stretch, but at the Oilers larger sense of direction. Edmontons decision to hire Mike Babcock already invited scrutiny, and Messier added another layer by framing it as more than just a coaching choice, turning the focus toward how the organization makes major calls.
What makes the criticism sting is the leadership angle. Messier took aim at the process behind the hire and the way the clubs leadership group fit into it, raising a familiar question for a team that has spent years trying to balance star power with structure. For an Oilers team still trying to define its identity, the debate now is not only about the coach they brought in, but about who should have had a voice in getting him there. [Read more 🡒]