Steve Yzerman didn’t leave much room for guessing when he finally addressed Dylan Larkin’s trade request.
At his post-draft press conference on Saturday, the Detroit Red Wings general manager confirmed that Larkin asked to be moved and that the captain’s agent gave the organization a list of teams he’d want to join. Yzerman also made it clear he was in no hurry to force anything through.
“Dylan has five years remaining on his contract,” Yzerman said during Saturday's press conference. “My job as the manager of the Detroit Red Wings is always to do what is in the best interest of the Detroit Red Wings, and I will act accordingly to that. I cannot make any guarantees, or did not make any guarantees, that that request could or would be met.”
He added that there may be more to say later. “I think I will be in a position to maybe answer more questions and be more specific in the future.”
That’s the key takeaway here: Larkin may have asked out, but Yzerman still has the upper hand. With five years left on the deal, the Red Wings don’t need to rush into a move, and Yzerman doesn’t sound interested in taking a lesser package just to get it done quickly. In a market where NHL trades have brought back huge returns, patience looks like the plan.
The length of Larkin’s contract matters. If he were closer to free agency, there would be more pressure to move him quickly and maximize the return.
Instead, this can stretch out. Yzerman appears perfectly willing to let it run all the way to camp if that’s what it takes to get the kind of haul he wants.
That doesn’t mean Larkin will still be in Detroit when next season begins. But it does suggest the Red Wings are in no mood to settle.
After Yzerman spoke, Larkin’s agent, Pat Brisson, addressed the situation with The Athletic and struck a more conciliatory tone.
“I understand where he’s coming from,” Brisson said. “The process is that we’ve had discussions for the last month or so.
And we’ve agreed that we’ll be working together on this. I do understand that Steve and the organization have to do what’s best for the Red Wings.
We’re trying to work as a ‘team’ together on this to reach each of our goals, so to speak.
“We know it’s a sensitive file, understanding what Dylan means to the Red Wings and also to USA Hockey and the world of hockey. He’s a really good hockey player. But we’re going to continue to the best of our abilities to eventually reach our goals.”
Brisson did not go into detail about the list of teams Larkin submitted, and that silence leaves plenty unresolved. The list could change, and the Red Wings could keep pushing until it does. Yzerman’s comments may have been the first public step in a process that still has a long way to go.
For now, the message from Detroit is simple: if Larkin is moved, it will be on the Red Wings’ terms.
In Other News...
Yzerman Just Raised The Stakes Around Detroits Core Identity
Steve Yzerman spent part of his latest media availability outlining a familiar offseason balancing act, the kind that comes with trying to push a team forward without losing sight of what still makes it tick. For Detroit, that meant talking about Patrick Kane as a pending unrestricted free agent and signaling a desire to keep him around, a nod to the offense and veteran presence he brought while the Red Wings continue sorting out their next step.
The bigger layer is the one hanging over the rosters identity. Yzerman also addressed Dylan Larkins situation, and while the captains status has become part of the conversation, nothing was framed as final or guaranteed. For a team trying to define itself around its core, that leaves Detroit in a delicate spot, weighing leadership, scoring, and continuity all at once while the rest of the market keeps moving around it. [Read more 🡒]
Red Wings May Be Near A Roster Decision Fans Saw Coming
With the NHL buyout window set to open June 30, Detroit is already weighing whether it makes sense to shake up the roster for the sake of flexibility. The Red Wings are looking at one of their recent contract decisions with a colder eye now, because a move like this would not be about escaping a cap crisis so much as creating a little more room to maneuver as they sort out the next wave of players.
The appeal is straightforward: a buyout would clear a spot for younger talent and give the front office more options as it balances the present against what comes next. It would also push the financial pain further down the road, which is why this is the kind of decision teams only make when they believe the short-term roster gain is worth the longer cap trail. [Read more 🡒]