The Green Bay Packers are walking into Ford Field with a deep passing game that looks dangerous on paper, but the film says it’s a lot more selective than the raw numbers suggest.
That matters for the Detroit Lions, who will host their first divisional opponent of the season in Week 7 on Sunday afternoon. Green Bay arrives at 4-2 after two big wins, and the matchup that jumps off the page is obvious: the Packers’ explosive passing attack against a Lions secondary that has already given up a lot through the air.
Headed into Week 6, Green Bay ranked fourth in explosive play rate on passes, while Detroit’s defense sat 17th despite allowing a league-high 297.4 passing yards per game. But when you dig into every one of the Packers’ 32 deep throws of 20-plus air yards, the story gets more complicated.
The biggest takeaway is that Green Bay’s aggression shows up mostly when it can afford to show up. Of those 32 deep attempts, only four came while the Packers were trailing, and all four happened in the same game: Week 3 against the Atlanta Falcons.
Two of them came after the two-minute warning in the fourth quarter, with Green Bay already down 35-14. None of those four throws were completed.
The split becomes even clearer when you look at the full passing picture. Jordan Love has thrown 60 passes this season while the Packers have been behind, and only 6.67% of those were deep shots. When Green Bay has had the lead, Love has taken 16 deep shots on 103 attempts, which works out to 15.5%.
The same kind of shift shows up underneath. With the lead, the Packers have thrown short passes under 10 air yards 64 times on 103 pass plays, or 62.2%. When trailing, that number rises to 44 short throws on 60 pass plays, or 73.3%.
That’s the odd shape of Matt LaFleur’s aggression: he’s more willing to push the ball when his team is in control, and more conservative when the game starts to tighten. It makes the deep ball look like a major weapon, but it functions more like a strike when the opportunity is there.
When the shot lands, it can change everything. When it doesn’t, the Packers can live without it.
That situational split also shows up in the down-and-distance data. Green Bay rarely unleashes deep balls in second-and-short or second-and-medium spots, especially on second down. The clearest example is that the only two deep throws in second-and-medium came against Dallas in Week 6, both on second-and-6 from inside the Dallas 26-yard line.
So even when the Packers are in a favorable down-and-distance setup, LaFleur still doesn’t always reach for the explosive play. The risk-taking tends to show up more when the Packers already hold the advantage on the scoreboard.
And then there’s the hit-or-miss nature of the execution itself.
Love has completed 10 of 32 deep throws this season, a 31% rate. But six of those completions came in one game, Week 5 against the Chicago Bears, when he went 6-for-8 on deep passes. In three games, he didn’t complete a single deep ball: 0-for-3 against the New York Jets, 0-for-7 against the Falcons, and 0-for-6 against the Cowboys.
Without that outburst against Chicago, Green Bay is only 4-for-26 on deep passes this season, which is 15.8%.
That Bears game is where the film gets especially interesting. Five of Love’s eight deep throws came on first-and-10, and four of those were play-action.
In one example, the Packers used a simple two-man fade-out concept. Against Cover-3, the out route would be open underneath the outside fade.
But Chicago was in Cover-2, and the deep safety had responsibility for the outside fade. The safety got caught with dirty eyes in the backfield and stayed flat-footed, and that mistake turned into an easy Green Bay touchdown.
If the Lions rookie Keith Abney gets more snaps at free safety this week, the Packers will almost certainly test his eyes.
The design there wasn’t especially complex either. It was a single-read throw for Love, not a heavy progression.
Another deep completion from that game came on a similarly straightforward concept, with the core routes working to the field side of the formation. LaFleur didn’t ask Love to do much on the play, and Love still delivered it with good timing and ball placement before Bears rookie safety Dillon Theineman (31) could close on the route in zone coverage.
For Detroit, the warning sign is obvious: the Lions have struggled deep in coverage, allowing 12 completions on 22 attempts. But Green Bay’s passing game is not some unstoppable machine outside of that Chicago game.
There are also clear target tendencies. Love has leaned heavily on Matthew Golden and Christian Watson, with 14 of his 32 deep targets going to Golden and 10 to Watson. How defensive coordinator Kelvin Sheppard chooses to respond will be worth watching, especially after the unique coverages he used against the Arizona Cardinals.
Pressure doesn’t appear to change much in Love’s deep passing either. He is 4-for-16 when pressured and 6-for-16 when kept clean.
If Detroit wants to keep Green Bay’s explosive game from taking over, the path is pretty clear: get ahead early, force the Packers out of their preferred script, and make them play from behind.
In Other News...
Lions Just Got A Real Opening In The NFC North Race
The NFC North race has suddenly opened up a bit for Detroit, and the reason has as much to do with the calendar as it does with what the Lions have already done on the field. Even though Minnesota is still ahead in the standings, Tankathons strength-of-schedule rankings point to a more favorable path for the Lions down the stretch, with several upcoming games that should give them a chance to keep stacking wins after the bye week.
Detroit still has plenty of work to do, but the matchup mix ahead looks friendlier than what Minnesota is facing. The Lions have divisional games and a handful of contests against teams with losing records on the schedule, while the Vikings are set to deal with a tougher closing stretch against stronger opponents, a setup that could swing the division race before long. [Read more 🡒]
Lions Post-Bye Ceiling May Hinge On One Defensive Starter
The Lions have plenty to like after three wins to open 2026, especially on offense, where the scoring has been rolling along at nearly 33 points per game. The defense has been a different story, giving up almost 30 a night and leaving some real work for the stretch after the bye. As the conversation turns to who can help stabilize things, Jack Campbell is one of the names drawing the most attention after a breakout 2025 season raised the bar for what he can be in the middle of this unit.
Campbell is not the only player the Lions need more from, with Jameson Williams and Isaac TeSlaa also part of the broader push to keep the offense carrying its share while the defense catches up. But the spotlight on Campbell feels especially sharp because the teams post-bye ceiling may depend on a defensive starter who was supposed to be one of its tone-setters. If Detroit is going to turn a good start into something sturdier, the next few weeks should tell the story. [Read more 🡒]
Mike Valenti Just Sharpened The Debate Over Brad Holmes' Secondary Plan
The Lions secondary debate got another jolt this week as sports talk host Mike Valenti put a sharper edge on the conversation around Brad Holmes approach. Valenti pointed to Detroits pass defense and held up Joey Porter Jr. as the kind of corner who could have changed the look of that unit, a reminder that the Lions work in the back end remains a lingering talking point even as the roster has been built up elsewhere.
Porters recent stop with the Dallas Cowboys only added another layer to the discussion, since his availability became an issue after he missed a game because of illness. For Detroit, the bigger question is still the one Valenti pushed to the front: whether the front office passed on the kind of coverage help that might have made the defense look much sturdier. [Read more 🡒]