Daniel Gafford has quietly become the backbone of Dallas’ defense, and the numbers are starting to make that impossible to ignore.
Through the early part of his eighth professional season, Gafford has been the NBA’s most effective rim deterrent. Opponents are shooting 22.1 percentage points below their expected field goal percentage at the basket when he’s the one protecting it. That kind of impact is huge, even if it hasn’t always shown up in the loudest way on the scoreboard.
The Mavericks have leaned heavily on that presence. Dallas is 21.7 points per 100 possessions better with Gafford on the floor, a massive swing that tells the story of how much he matters to what they’re doing defensively. But the bigger issue is what that says about the rest of the unit: the Mavericks’ early defensive profile has been built around Gafford’s interior work and opponents simply missing open threes.
That’s a fragile foundation.
Dallas is not forcing turnovers at a strong clip, and the 3-point numbers around the league’s early season sample are starting to raise eyebrows. Opponents are hitting just 29.7 percent from deep against the Mavericks, which ranks 29th in the NBA. That might be sustainable if Dallas were truly strangling shooters on the perimeter, but the deeper numbers suggest some regression could be coming.
Opponents are shooting 35.5 percent on wide-open 3s, which ranks 17th, and only 26.6 percent on open 3s, which ranks 30th. That second number stands out. It sits nearly eight percentage points below the league median, and the math is simple enough: if opponents were merely average on those open looks, they’d be making about one more 3-pointer per game.
The turnover piece isn’t helping much either. Mavericks opponents are averaging 15.0 turnovers per game, which ranks 23rd in the league.
Dallas has done a decent job turning those takeaways into offense, ranking 14th with 18.8 points off turnovers per game. That also fits with the Mavericks’ transition game, since they rank fifth in fast-break points despite being 18th in pace.
Still, the clearest strength on this defense is what happens at the rim, and Gafford is the reason. He’s handling a team-high 6.0 rim attempts per game and holding opponents 22.1 percentage points below expectation there.
By comparison, Morez Johnson Jr. has allowed opponents to shoot 15.2 percentage points above expected, while P.J. Washington has allowed them to shoot 5.1 percentage points above expected.
That leads to the obvious concern: what does Dallas look like when Gafford sits?
The answer, at least so far, is not especially encouraging. The Mavericks’ net rating climbs to 12.1 with Gafford on the floor and drops to minus-2.0 when he’s on the bench.
Opponents are also shooting nearly a full percentage point better from the field without him. That’s a pretty clear sign of how much the defense bends around his presence.
And if Gafford misses time, the questions get even louder. Johnson, Washington and Moussa Cisse are part of the conversation, but Dallas does not have a clean answer behind him.
Cisse has played only 13 minutes this season, and Dereck Lively II has not appeared yet. Cisse has 42 career games under his belt, while Lively has played 98 across three-plus professional seasons.
For now, Gafford has been terrific to open the 2026-27 campaign. The problem is that his value is also exposing how dependent the Mavericks are on him. Dallas already knew its perimeter defense had issues coming into the season, but Gafford’s rim protection has been the thing keeping some of those warning signs out of view.
In Other News...
Caleb Martin Gives Mavericks What They Need If One Thing Holds Up
Caleb Martins return has given the Mavericks a jolt on the wing just as theyve needed one. After missing the first four games with a right thumb sprain, he stepped back in and immediately looked like the kind of two-way piece Dallas had in mind, bringing the sort of perimeter defense that can change the tone of a game and help stabilize a group still sorting out its identity.
What makes Martin especially important is that his value does not stop at one end of the floor. The Mavericks view him as their best perimeter defender, but his offense will help determine how far that defensive edge can carry them, and early signs have been encouraging. He has looked fully healthy after dealing with shoulder issues before, and in his first two games back he has already shown enough scoring punch to suggest Dallas may have found a key rotation answer if his shot keeps holding up. [Read more 🡒]
Kyrie Irving Is Making Mavericks Trade Talk Much Harder To Ignore
The Mavericks have opened the season 4-2 and sit seventh in the Western Conference, and Kyrie Irving has been a big reason why the early picture looks so encouraging. He has settled in as a steadying force on both ends, giving Dallas a more efficient offense and a sharper defensive edge while the group around him continues to look increasingly comfortable together.
Irvings play has also made the trade conversation around Dallas harder to dismiss, because the case for making a major move gets murkier when the current core is working this well. With the Mavericks already showing real cohesion and Irving producing at a high level, the front office has a more complicated decision on its hands than it did a few weeks ago. [Read more 🡒]
Mavericks Draft Decision Is Already Turning Into A Fan Debate
Morez Johnson Jr. was the Mavericks ninth overall pick in the 2026 NBA Draft, and his early NBA stretch has already become a talking point in Dallas. The rookie has shown only modest production so far, and a high foul rate has kept his minutes in check, which is never the kind of start that settles a fan base. It also adds an extra layer to the conversation because Johnson and the player drawing the loudest comparisons both came through Michigan under first-year Mavericks coach Dusty May.
Yaxel Lendeborg has been the early standard-bearer in that debate, giving fans plenty of reason to wonder how the draft board might look in hindsight. His stronger scoring and efficiency have made the gap feel more pronounced in the opening weeks, and because both players were tied to the same college program and coach, every early box score gets treated like a referendum. For now, the Mavericks are left with a familiar draft-night question hanging over them: whether the long view will justify the choice, or whether the noise around it is only going to grow. [Read more 🡒]