Julian “JuJu” Lewis opened the season as the quarterback Colorado was supposed to build around. Five games in, that plan looks anything but settled.
Lewis did not see the field in Colorado’s 29-7 loss to Texas Tech on Saturday, while Isaac Wilson got the start and went 26 of 44 for 290 yards, one touchdown and three interceptions. Freshman Kaneal Sweetwyne also logged limited snaps, and Lewis stayed on the sideline throughout.
That absence quickly turned into something bigger than a simple quarterback shuffle.
Matt McCall, a Colorado alumnus who posts on X as “Moneyline Matt,” said Lewis’ camp had told Deion Sanders and the Colorado staff that the quarterback was done playing for the Buffaloes. McCall added that Lewis planned to sit out the rest of the season before entering the transfer portal. Neither Lewis, his family nor Colorado has confirmed that claim.
Sanders, though, made clear after the loss that Lewis’ situation was not as straightforward as a standard depth-chart move.
“ I would love for JuJu to come in here and he tell you what happened,” Sanders said. “So don’t, ‘You benched JuJu, first and third string.’
No, that’s not how it went down. It didn’t happen like that.”
That answer only goes so far once Colorado’s access rules enter the picture. Reporters can’t just walk into the football facility and ask Lewis to explain himself. The program decides which players are available, so unless Colorado puts Lewis in front of the media, Sanders is pointing reporters toward someone they may not be able to reach.
The same issue showed up in Wilson’s postgame availability Saturday. Several beat writers introduced themselves to him before taking questions, which suggested that some of them were speaking to him in that setting for the first time. For a quarterback making his first start in a nationally relevant conference game, that was telling.
And it makes Sanders’ suggestion even harder to carry out. If reporters have not had real access to Wilson, why should anyone assume Lewis will suddenly be made available to explain one of the most sensitive personnel questions on the roster?
It is also not the first time Sanders has answered a question by sending reporters to a player or staff member who is not typically accessible. That approach lets him avoid speaking for someone else, but it can also serve as a dodge when the program controls the access.
Colorado’s restrictions on outside coverage have already drawn notice. Before the season, reporters at open practices were barred from publishing observations about injuries, personnel groupings, player performances or depth-chart movement. The school also warned that breaking those rules could lead to removal, credential revocation or future access limits.
Sanders may genuinely want Lewis to tell his side. If that is the case, Colorado would need to make it possible.
Until then, the questions around Lewis are not going away.
In Other News...
Rockies Cannot Waste Warren Schaeffers Progress With This Roster Again
Warren Schaeffers first full season running the Rockies did not come with a winning record, but it did come with something Colorado has lacked for far too long: clear signs of progress. After taking over for Bud Black in 2025 and having the interim tag removed, Schaeffer guided a team that still lost 104 games in 2026 but improved by 15 wins from the previous year, while young pieces started to give the lineup a little shape. Rookies TJ Rumfield and Cole Carrigg supplied encouraging production, and the anticipation around Charlie Condons eventual arrival only adds to the sense that the offense is finally pointing somewhere.
Paul DePodesta has already credited Schaeffer for the work hes done, and the front office seems to believe the manager has earned more runway. The problem, as DePodesta made clear, is that progress from the dugout can only carry a roster so far when the pitching still lags behind. For the Rockies, the encouraging signs around Schaeffer and the young bats are real, but they also sharpen the warning: if the roster isnt upgraded in a meaningful way, another season of growth could again be swallowed by the same old imbalance. [Read more 🡒]
Rockies Just Gave Fans Another Reason To Question Their Loyalty
The Rockies are asking fans to keep buying in, even as the on-field product keeps giving them reasons to look elsewhere. After another rough year capped by a fourth straight losing season, the team announced plans to raise season ticket prices for 2027, a move that lands awkwardly for a club that has already spent years trying to rebuild trust with its base.
Team president Walker Monfort framed the increase around the economics of running the franchise, pointing to the clubs traditionally low ticket prices, rising minimum wage costs and lost TV revenue. Still, for a fan base that watched Colorado finish with the worst record in baseball and continue to struggle with engagement, the timing only adds another layer to the frustration surrounding a team already fighting an uphill battle for loyalty. [Read more 🡒]
Rockies Face A Brutal Pitching Reality After Another Last-Place Year
Another last-place finish left the Rockies staring at the same problem that has dogged them for much of the recent rebuild: the pitching. Colorado went 58-104 in 2026, worst in baseball for a second straight season, and the rotation and bullpen never found enough stability to climb out of the league basement. The teams ERA sat at the bottom of the majors, a blunt reminder that even modest progress elsewhere can get buried when the mound work lags this far behind.
The offseason arrives with little certainty and plenty of turnover. The front office has already acknowledged the pitching mess and signaled that it will try to add arms for 2027, even though drawing pitchers to Colorado remains one of the sports toughest selling jobs. One thing makes the challenge even sharper: several familiar starters are headed back into free agency, leaving the Rockies with even more work to do before spring training begins. [Read more 🡒]