Jonathan Drouin Just Became A Very Intriguing Avalanche Question

Could Jonathan Drouin's buyout prompt a return to Colorado, where he enjoyed a career peak just a few years ago?

Jonathan Drouin’s path back to Colorado is suddenly back on the table.

The former Avalanche forward was placed on waivers by the St. Louis Blues on Tuesday for buyout purposes, and he’ll become an unrestricted free agent at noon ET on Wednesday. That opens the door for a possible reunion with the team where he spent two seasons from 2023 to 2025.

Drouin, 31, was a major part of Colorado’s top six while Gabe Landeskog was out. His time with the Avs was easily the most productive stretch of his career, built largely alongside longtime friend Nathan MacKinnon.

Last summer, Drouin didn’t wanted to leave Colorado, but he ultimately wasn’t going to get anything remotely close to what he signed for had he stayed. He instead landed a two-year, $8 million deal with the New York Islanders after the 2025 postseason.

That move never really settled in. Drouin opened the season well, then faded after roughly the first 20 games and eventually became a throw-in in the trade that sent Brayden Schenn from St.

Louis to New York. He finished with four goals and 24 points in 64 games.

The numbers in Colorado tell a much different story. In 2023-24, Drouin posted 56 points in 70 games while costing less than a million dollars against the cap. He followed that with 37 points in 43 games before losing his spot in the top six after Landeskog returned in the postseason.

Now the question is whether Colorado could make the fit work again. Joe Sakic said last week the club wants to add a forward or two and a defenseman with roughly $6 million in cap space. If Drouin is willing to come in cheap again, he could give the Avalanche another middle-six option - or even fill a top-six opening left by Valeri Nichushkin.

He’d almost certainly have more lucrative offers elsewhere, though, so any return to Colorado would come down to choice as much as opportunity. Given how much he enjoyed being with the Avs the first time, it’s not out of the question.

In Other News...

Avalanche May Have Found A Cheap Answer To Their Depth Problem

The qualifying-offer deadline on June 29 has already started to reshape the Avalanches summer picture, and for Colorado it was a fairly quiet cut-down day. Daniil Gushchin was the only player in the organization who did not receive a qualifying offer, which put him on track to become an unrestricted free agent and left the front office with one more roster decision to sort through as it tries to round out its forward depth.

From there, the more interesting question is how Colorado shops the market for inexpensive help. A few unrestricted free agent forwards have surfaced as possible fits for the Avalanche based on need and recent performance, including Matias Maccelli, Philipp Kurashev and Arthur Kaliyev. Maccelli stands out as the kind of winger who could help fill minutes opened by departures on the wing, while the others offer the sort of low-cost, upside-driven options teams often examine when they need scoring depth without spending much. [Read more 🡒]

Avalanche Just Got Linked To A Center Fans Will Debate

With free agency about to open, the Avalanche are being mentioned in the kind of center-market chatter that tends to get fans talking for all the right and wrong reasons. One name floating around is Boone Jenner, a seasoned Columbus Blue Jackets pivot whose profile fits a few obvious needs: experience, stability down the middle and a long track record of handling faceoffs at a reliable level.

The fit is easy to understand, even if the deal itself is not. Colorado already has Nathan MacKinnon, Brock Nelson, Nicolas Roy and Fyodor Svechkov in the middle, so any additional move would have to make sense both on the ice and on the cap sheet. Jenners previous price point gives a sense of where the discussion may go next, but for now this is still only a possibility, leaving the real debate to whether the Avalanche would want him and what kind of number would make it work. [Read more 🡒]