Avalanche Were Right To Move On From Casey Mittelstadt

The Boston Bruins seem poised to repeat the Colorado Avalanche's misstep by extending an underperforming Casey Mittelstadt, a decision that may burden their cap management.

The Boston Bruins may be on the verge of repeating a mistake the Colorado Avalanche already learned the hard way.

Casey Mittelstadt is the name at the center of it. Colorado once tried to make him the answer after moving on from Nazem Kadri, and the move quickly turned into a two-part misfire: the Avalanche dealt Bowen Byram, then doubled down by extending Mittelstadt. Eventually, they reached the point where they had to move him on, and Boston became the beneficiary.

So far, Mittelstadt has been serviceable in a Bruins sweater, but not the kind of difference-maker that justifies a big commitment. In 71 games last season, he scored 15 goals and finished with 42 points.

That’s useful production. It’s not the sort of output that makes a four-year, $26 million deal feel like a bargain.

That rumored price tag is exactly where the danger sits for Boston. A $6.5 million cap hit would put the Bruins in a spot where they’re paying for a ceiling Mittelstadt hasn’t shown he can consistently reach.

Colorado, for its part, looks justified in having cut bait when it did. The Avalanche clearly viewed Mittelstadt’s $5.75 million cap hit as a mistake, even if it didn’t look that way initially. They expected the 27-year-old to grow into the second-line center role they needed, and that never really happened.

The return from Boston didn’t end up being the final word either. Charlie Coyle didn’t last, but the deal eventually brought back Gavin Brindley. If Brindley becomes a regular in the Avalanche lineup, Colorado will have turned a bad bet into something far more manageable.

What Mittelstadt has looked like in Boston is more middle-six winger than top-six center, and that matters here. The Bruins hoped a change of scenery would unlock more, but that hasn’t been the story so far. If they now hand him a raise, they’d be tying up cap space in a player who hasn’t proven he can justify that kind of investment.

Maybe Boston thinks it can squeeze more out of him. But if the Bruins go through with it, they’d be doing exactly what Colorado wisely avoided: paying too much and hoping the rest takes care of itself.

In Other News...

Avalanche May Have Found An Under The Radar Blue Line Option

Colorado added another depth option to its system with the signing of Domenick Fensore, a 24-year-old left defenseman who is expected to land with the Colorado Eagles in 2026-27. Fensore comes with some AHL mileage already, having played for the Chicago Wolves and made a lone NHL appearance with the Carolina Hurricanes, and he arrives in the Avalanche organization after a 2025-26 season that showed real growth.

Fensore set career highs in goals, assists and points last year and then stayed in the mix through 18 playoff games, the kind of workload that can matter for a player trying to carve out a path. For Colorado, the appeal is straightforward: a young defenseman with some pro experience, a left shot, and a track record that suggests there may still be a little more to unlock. [Read more 🡒]

Avalanche Suddenly Face A Cale Makar Debate Fans Never Expected

Even around a franchise that has shown a willingness to make bold, sometimes jarring moves, the idea of the Avalanche entertaining a Cale Makar trade still lands like a shock. Adrian Hernandez of Mile High Hockey raised the possibility while pointing to the reality that Makar, one of the most important players on the roster, carries significant leverage as contract talks loom and the team keeps one eye on how it manages its long-term cap structure.

The timing adds another layer, with a September 15 deadline shaping how teams can approach eight-year deals for unrestricted free agents before that option narrows. Colorados recent history has already taught fans not to rule out the unexpected, and while a Makar deal remains far from a certainty, the mere fact that it is part of the conversation speaks to how complicated the next stretch could become. [Read more 🡒]