The Browns spent the offseason tearing down and rebuilding an offensive line that had clearly run its course, and the work came with a lot of moving parts. Andrew Berry leaned on trades, free agency, and the draft to replace Joel Bitonio, Wyatt Teller, Jack Conklin, and Ethan Pocic, a wholesale reset that left Cleveland with a completely different look up front.
That new group is supposed to be built around veterans Tytus Howard, Zion Johnson, and Elgton Jenkins, with No. 9 overall pick Spencer Fano stepping in at left tackle as the first offensive lineman selected in the 2026 draft. Teven Jenkins is the likeliest answer at right guard, while rookies Parker Brailsford and Austin Barber are expected to add depth alongside Dawand Jones and KT Leveston.
Still, Sharp Football Analysis wasn’t buying the optimism. In its weighted point system, based on votes on a 100-point scale, Cleveland landed at No. 32 with just five points.
“The Browns' offensive line ranked in our top five as recently as 2024, but not a single starter remains on the roster from that unit,” the popular NFL data site reasoned. “Cleveland used eight offensive line combinations for at least 50 snaps last year and will be starting all over again with six additions to the two-deep and likely four new starters.”
That assessment is harsh, but it isn’t random. The Browns are trying to piece together a line that could feature five new starters, including at least one rookie, and none of that group has taken a snap together yet. On paper, that’s a shaky place to start.
Berry has gotten plenty of credit this offseason, from the draft to free agency to the Myles Garrett trade on June 1. But the bigger issue is how Cleveland got here in the first place. The team entered 2025 with Bitonio, Teller, Conklin, and Pocic all on contracts set to void after the season, while Jones was starting at left tackle after back-to-back season-ending injuries.
In March, Cleveland let those deals void and absorbed the combined $49 million in dead money on this year’s cap. Berry then traded for Howard, committed $32.3 million in guarantees to Johnson, and signed Jenkins, who is still working back from a leg injury that included a fractured lower leg and ligament damage.
The draft brought more upside, but also more uncertainty. Fano is making the jump from right tackle, where he played exclusively at Utah opposite Caleb Lomu over the past two seasons, to the left side.
Barber, a third-round pick, may not have a clear path to immediate playing time unless the Browns move him inside. Brailsford, a fifth-round pick, has an outside shot at the starting center job, but that would be a real climb.
Teven Jenkins is the most likely answer at right guard, though his NFL career has taken him all over the line and he played just 324 offensive snaps for Cleveland last season, according to Pro Football Focus.
So yes, the Browns did add stability and flexibility after a miserable 2025 season in which injuries kept wrecking every combination they tried. But there’s no real proof yet that this group should be ranked much higher. Until the new line actually takes the field and produces something concrete, starting at the bottom is a defensible call.
It also circles back to the long-term planning that put Cleveland in this spot. The Browns tried to squeeze one more year out of a veteran-heavy line while knowing the quarterback situation was shaky and the odds of competing were slim. In that draft, they took two running backs, two quarterbacks, and no offensive linemen.
Now they’re paying for it, and Sharp Football’s No. 32 ranking is just the latest reminder. The Browns might end up with a better line than that. Right now, though, they haven’t earned the benefit of the doubt.
In Other News...
Browns May Already Have A Jerry Jeudy Decision Looming
Jerry Jeudys first season in Cleveland was always going to come with a little roster math attached, and that math may already be shifting. With the Browns seeing younger receivers push into the picture, Jeudy no longer looks like the obvious centerpiece he might have been when he arrived, which naturally puts his place in the long-term plan under the microscope.
The contract helps make the conversation more real, because a move would not require a team to tear up its cap sheet to get involved. For Cleveland, the question is whether the best value lies in keeping a proven veteran around or cashing in while his name still carries appeal, and that kind of decision can surface quickly once other teams start calling. [Read more 🡒]
Latest Myles Garrett Trade Take Reopens A Painful Browns Debate
A fresh re-grade of the Myles Garrett deal has put the Browns back in the middle of an old, uncomfortable question: did Cleveland move its star pass rusher at the right time, or did it wait too long to maximize the return? In the original swap with the Rams, the Browns landed first-, second- and third-round picks along with Jared Verse, a player already viewed as one of the leagues better edge threats, and the move was widely seen as one of Andrew Berrys boldest calls.
Bleacher Reports Moe Moton wasnt as generous this time, giving Cleveland a C and the Rams an A while arguing the Browns should have dealt Garrett earlier, before the teams timeline and his desire to contend drifted further apart. It is the kind of debate that never really goes away in the NFL, especially when a front office manages to extract a strong package for a premium player, but still leaves enough room for people to wonder whether the best value was already on the table a year sooner. [Read more 🡒]