The Big Ten has drawn a financial line in the sand for its schools.
On Wednesday, the conference announced an immediate $49 million NIL spending cap for every member institution, a move built to track the framework of the Protect College Sports Act, which is still waiting for a House vote. The Big Ten said it wants schools budgeting now for a system that could be in place soon, even if the bill itself remains unresolved.
The conference’s plan breaks the total into two parts. One is the $21.6 million revenue-sharing cap established by the House settlement. The other is a $27.5 million limit on third-party NIL spending, including money routed through collectives.
“While we await the passage of the Protect College Sports Act, which has our full support, it is imperative our member institutions can begin to plan, budget and build their rosters approximating the act's economic structure,” the Big Ten council of chancellors said in a statement. “Our institutions remain in full support of the Protect College Sports Act and this rule not only allows for a much smoother transition into the policies put in place by the act once it passes, but demonstrates our commitment to it.”
The number matters because some Big Ten schools are already operating at a massive scale. Oregon and Ohio State are spending more than $40 million on football alone this year, according to CBS Sports. Michigan and USC are close behind, nearing that same mark.
The Protect College Sports Act would push spending even higher in a different structure, with schools able to spend roughly $50 million on athlete payments. The House settlement figure would stay unchanged, but athletic departments would also be allowed a retention fund of up to $22.5 million to keep players from leaving, along with $5 million set aside specifically for women’s and Olympic sports.
For now, the bill’s path is still murky. The House is on recess through the midterm elections on Tuesday and will return several days later on Nov.
- A vote could happen then, but the lame-duck period creates uncertainty around whether the legislation can actually clear the finish line before Jan. 3, when a new Congress is sworn in.
After that date, any bill that has not become law would have to start over.
“I’m not sure what the fight is going to be like in lame duck as they try to push this over the edge, especially if the House switches from Republican to Democrat,” Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), who opposes the bill, told CBS Sports. “Democrats should have a chance to really author a bill that corrects for a lot of the failings in this bill.”
There are also internal disputes over what should be added before passage. Some Republicans want a ban on treating athletes as employees, while others are pushing for a hard cap on the number of international athletes in college sports. If lawmakers change the bill at this stage, it would have to go back to the Senate for another vote, which would make an already difficult path even harder.
In Other News...
Clemsons Offensive Mess May Not Be On Chad Morris After All
The conversation around Clemsons offense has turned into a familiar one, but Eric Mac Lain is pushing back on the easy explanation. The former Tigers player and current ACC Network analyst says the struggles are less about offensive coordinator Chad Morris and more about the way the unit is executing on the field, with breakdowns up front and around the passing game making everything look harder than it should.
Mac Lain also points to the situation at quarterback as part of the problem, saying freshman Tait Reynolds is being asked to start before he is ready because of injuries and a lack of transfer options. He says the offensive line has regressed in a major way, with communication and physical play both becoming issues, while the receivers are limited by an attack that is not giving them much help. [Read more 🡒]
Clemson Still Needs One Piece For Tait Reynolds To Find Rhythm
Freshman wide receiver Gordon Sellars III was sidelined last week with a concussion, and his status for Clemsons game against Florida State is still up in the air. The Tigers also have seven other players listed out, which was expected, but Sellars availability carries a different kind of weight because of what it means for the passing game and for quarterback Tait Reynolds as he keeps settling into the offense.
Reynolds has been asked to grow up quickly, and having another young target available would give him one more reliable option as Clemson tries to find a steadier rhythm through the air. If Sellars can return, it would give the Tigers a useful boost in both depth and timing, especially in a matchup where every rep matters for a quarterback still building comfort and confidence. [Read more 🡒]
Dillon Hunter Just Put Clemsons Backcourt In A Tense Spot
Dillon Hunters status has quietly become one of the more complicated offseason questions around Clemsons backcourt. The point guard is currently ineligible to play because of a stay granted by a Georgia appellate court in the Godfrey v. NCAA case, but he has now chosen to remove himself from that lawsuit and look for another path to eligibility. For Clemson, it leaves a point guard who is still on campus, still practicing and still part of the programs daily work, even if he cannot take the floor right now.
Brad Brownell confirmed the situation without getting into the legal weeds, which is about all a coach can do when the issue is working its way through the courts. Hunter may end up pursuing eligibility through another route, including the Williams lawsuit in Texas, but for now the Tigers are left waiting on a resolution that could shape how their backcourt looks once the season picture comes into focus. [Read more 🡒]