Joey Votto is wasting no time making himself heard in baseball media.
The former Reds star, long the face of Cincinnati for a generation of fans, appeared on MLB Now and took on one of the sport’s most stubborn debates: whether players linked to performance-enhancing drugs should be eligible for the National Baseball Hall of Fame.
Brian Kenny asked the question directly, and Votto didn’t give the kind of answer that would comfort the old guard.
"Conjecture is fair. Speculation is fair.
But are you going to use that as the final decision-maker?" Votto said when asked about PED players.
When Kenny pressed him on whether steroids were cheating, Votto pushed back again.
"It was a zeitgeist. That's what was going on during that time," Votto explained when he was bluntly asked if steroids were cheating during the height of the so-called PED era.
Votto’s point was less about excusing the era than about challenging how cleanly people try to sort it out after the fact. He raised the question of how widespread it really was.
"If you say it was cheating, then what percentage of the league was cheating? Was it 10% or was it 90%? And then all of the sudden, if you're saying it was cheating, have we omitted some that have kind of slipped through the cracks?"
The conversation lands in a sport that benefited from the attention those players brought. Sammy Sosa, Mark McGwire, and Barry Bonds remain the biggest names tied to performance-enhancing drugs, and all three helped draw new eyes to baseball.
That’s what makes the Hall of Fame argument so messy. One generation treats the issue like an unforgivable line-crossing; another sees a far less simple picture. Votto’s comments fit squarely in that tension, and they show he’s not afraid to step into the middle of it.
In Other News...
Joey Votto Just Changed His Tune On Elly De La Cruz
Joey Vottos view of Elly De La Cruz has come a long way from the caution he felt when the young shortstop first arrived in the majors. Votto admitted he once saw a player with plenty of flash but also plenty of risk, the kind of talent whose strikeouts, errors and recklessness could make it hard to trust the long view. Since then, De La Cruz has given him plenty of reason to rethink that stance, with Votto pointing to the way he works, carries himself and keeps showing up every day.
What stands out now, from Vottos perspective, is not just the tools but the steadiness behind them. He praised De La Cruzs humility and drive, and noted that the Reds have watched him turn raw ability into something more dependable through consistent performance and durability. Votto even placed him in rare company when talking about the shortstop standard in Cincinnati, which says plenty about how far De La Cruz has come in the eyes of one of the franchises most respected voices. [Read more 🡒]
One Reds Deadline Gamble Might Finally Be Worth The Wait
The Reds 2022 deadline haul is still being judged through a harsh lens, especially after the club shipped out Luis Castillo and Tyler Mahle in separate deals that reshaped the roster in a hurry. One of the quieter moves from that summer was sending Brandon Drury to San Diego for Victor Acosta, a return that has tested patience because Acosta spent years stuck in the lower minors before finally giving Cincinnati a reason to keep watching.
Acostas latest step forward came in Dayton, where he delivered a breakthrough game that hinted at more than just a hot night at the plate. For a trade that once looked like a footnote, that kind of performance matters, because the Reds are still waiting to see whether this is the start of a real climb or just another brief flash in a long, uneven development path. [Read more 🡒]
Reds Risk Making Their Ke'Bryan Hayes Mistake Even More Costly
When the Reds brought in KeBryan Hayes from Pittsburgh last July, it looked like a chance to buy low on a slick-fielding third baseman and reshape the roster with Taylor Rogers and Sammy Stafura going the other way. Instead, Hayes has struggled to provide much at the plate since arriving in Cincinnati, and the deal has quickly become one of those moves that looks different in hindsight than it did on paper.
That is what makes the next step so tricky for the front office. Hayes still carries a contract that runs through 2029, and if the Reds decide to move him again, they have to be careful not to turn a disappointing acquisition into a bigger problem by attaching him to other valuable pieces just to clear the books. [Read more 🡒]