Ja’Marr Chase’s Wednesday absence from practice stirred up some anxiety in Cincinnati, but Ian Rapoport poured cold water on the idea that the Bengals have a real problem on their hands.
Speaking Thursday on Good Morning Football, Rapoport said Chase’s Week 8 status is “far, far less worrisome” than the situation around Broncos receiver Jaylen Waddle, who may not play this week. Rapoport also noted, “Neither did Ja'Marr Chase for the Cincinnati Bengals.
This one far, far less worrisome, was listed as a rest day along with an ankle,” adding, “This is not considered to be a major deal in the Cincinnati Bengals, whose offense is humming. At least it was in the second half last week against the Baltimore Ravens.”
That should calm a fan base that was already on edge after Chase did not practice on Wednesday. With Cincinnati leaning so heavily on its offense again in Week 7, any hint that one of its biggest stars might be compromised was bound to set off alarm bells.
The concern came from the way Chase showed up on the injury report, with both a rest designation and an ankle note attached. That left some uncertainty about whether the absence was precautionary or something more. Rapoport’s report points strongly toward the former, with the issue sounding more like a veteran maintenance day than a serious setback.
Still, the Bengals will want to see Chase back on the field soon enough. If he misses another practice this week, the questions will start again.
The timing matters because Cincinnati is right in the thick of a crowded AFC North race. All four teams in the division have either four or five wins, which leaves very little room to breathe at the top.
For now, though, the Bengals at least have the matchup working in their favor. They go into Week 8 against an opponent that looks very beatable, so a win should be there for the taking whether Chase suits up or not.
In Other News...
Bengals Trade Deadline Debate Just Got Much Bigger Than Running Back
The trade deadline conversation around the Bengals has started to widen beyond the obvious running back chatter, even with marquee names like Jonathan Taylor and Saquon Barkley floating around the market. Cincinnatis interest in upgrading the backfield is understandable given Chase Browns uneven production, but the bigger question is whether a splashy move at that spot fits the way this front office usually operates.
For a team that has tended to lean draft-heavy in building its roster, the more practical fix may be elsewhere on the roster. The Bengals could use help in several spots, and the argument is growing that reinforcements on defense or up front might do more for the stretch run than chasing a high-profile runner. [Read more 🡒]
Bengals Trade Buzz Is Zeroing In On A Much More Realistic RB Move
The Bengals search for backfield help has started to sound a lot more practical as the NFL trade deadline approaches, and the name drawing the most attention is a veteran runner who could give Cincinnati immediate stability. The idea is less about chasing a splashy headline and more about finding a proven piece who can slide into the rotation with Chase Brown and help balance an offense that could use another reliable option on the ground.
What makes this possibility appealing is the combination of production and price. Compared with the bigger-name backs who tend to dominate deadline chatter, this is the kind of move that fits a team looking for help without overcommitting long term, especially with an expiring deal in play. Nothing is confirmed yet, but the buzz is clearly pointing toward a more realistic type of upgrade if Cincinnati decides to act. [Read more 🡒]
Jessie Bates Just Reopened A Painful Bengals What-If
Jessie Bates departure from Cincinnati in 2023 still lingers as one of those roster decisions that never really goes away. The Bengals chose not to offer him a multi-year contract, instead using their salary cap space elsewhere, and Bates has handled the business side of it with the same calm he showed on the field. Even so, his exit left a hole at safety that Cincinnati has spent the last couple of seasons trying to patch.
Bryan Cook was brought in to help stabilize that spot, but the larger issue remains the same: the Bengals have not found a clean replacement for what Bates brought. And while the move made sense in the moment from a cap-management standpoint, it has only sharpened the sense that this was one of those franchise crossroads that can be revisited for years. [Read more 🡒]
