The Bengals made one of the boldest swings of the NFL offseason when they sent the New York Giants the No. 10 pick for Dexter Lawrence II. It was a headline-grabbing move, especially with Trey Hendrickson having already gone to the Baltimore Ravens, and it immediately split opinion around the league.
ESPN came down hard on Cincinnati’s decision, calling it the biggest and worst move of the team’s offseason. The criticism centered on the price tag and Lawrence’s most recent production.
“The Bengals made a high-profile trade, sending the No. 10 pick to the Giants in exchange for Lawrence. The move was both uncharacteristic and unwise.
Yes, Cincinnati needs to invest resources into its defense. But this was not the way to do it.
Lawrence is a good player who has been elite in the past. But he is coming off a down season - just an 8.4% pass rush win rate and 0.5 sacks.
There’s also a big difference between sending the No. 10 pick and, say, a late first-rounder. And that’s why this was too pricey a trade.”
ESPN reported.
That’s a fair way to frame the risk. But from Cincinnati’s side, the logic is obvious: the Bengals had to do something to keep their Super Bowl window from slipping shut. Whether Lawrence is a perfect fit or not, the defense needed a jolt.
That has been the franchise’s biggest problem. The 2021 unit wasn’t dominant, but it was solid enough to help win games. Since that playoff run, Cincinnati has too often watched Joe Burrow and the backup quarterbacks deliver big performances only to see the defense fail to get the stop that mattered most.
Lawrence now steps into a defense that has already been reshaped. The secondary has been retooled, the team has two promising EDGE defenders, and free agent Jonathan Allen is also in the mix. Put it all together, and there’s at least a path for this group to improve on paper.
The contract and the compensation will be worth watching as the deal settles in. But the Bengals don’t need this defense to be special.
They just need it to be average. If Lawrence helps them get there, the move will look a lot different than the early criticism suggests.
In Other News...
Former Bengals Fan Favorite Faces A Brutal Test Of Trust
Jake Browning is trying to carve out a new role in Tampa Bay after his run as a Bengals backup made him one of the more familiar reserve quarterbacks around the league. Cincinnati fans remember the stretch in 2023 when he stepped in for Joe Burrow and helped keep the offense afloat, showing enough poise to make his case as a legitimate option whenever the team needed him. Now he is back in a familiar kind of competition, working behind Baker Mayfield as he looks to secure a place on the Buccaneers depth chart.
The wrinkle is that the job is not sitting there for Browning by default. Analysts around Tampa Bay see a real battle for the backup spot, with Connor Bazelak also in the mix, and Browning arrives with both proof of what he can do and fresh questions after a difficult recent stretch. For the Bengals, it is a reminder of how quickly a trusted reserve can move from being a safety net to a player with something to prove, and Browning still has a chance to show he can be that reliable option again if Mayfield ever goes down. [Read more 🡒]
Bengals Still Havent Made The Cheap Linebacker Move Fans Want
The Bengals have spent plenty of time talking around their linebacker problem, but the issue itself has not gone away. It remains one of the clearer weak spots on the roster, which is why the search for a fix keeps circling back to the same kind of affordable veteran help that could steady the middle of the defense without forcing a major roster overhaul.
One name that keeps surfacing fits that mold as well as anyone because of his background, athletic profile and recent production. He has moved around enough to offer some lineup flexibility, and the case for adding him is built on a blend of run support, coverage and pressure ability that the Bengals could use right now, even if the front office has so far stopped short of making the move fans have been waiting for. [Read more 🡒]