Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark made headlines before the first full day of media questions even got rolling in Frisco.
The conference opened 2026 Big 12 Media Days on Tuesday at the Ford Center at The Star, where Yormark spent about 15 minutes laying out his vision for the league. He announced a partnership with Monster Energy that will feature jersey patches and on-field logos, and he also repeated his position on College Football Playoff expansion and sports gambling.
Once the questions started, one exchange quickly turned sharp.
Sean Dillon of Rockin' Pregame asked Yormark about what he described as the league’s treatment of Texas Tech over the past year, and Yormark immediately pushed back.
"Let me come closer, stand up. Ask that question again, and I'm going to give you the answer I want to give you," Yormark told Dillon.
Dillon then repeated his point, bringing up Texas Tech’s fine over tortillas, the ban on tortillas altogether, Oklahoma State’s paddles receiving a noisemaker exemption in 2012, the lawsuit involving Brendan Sorsby, and Cincinnati not being punished.
"Texas Tech got fined for tortillas, and tortillas were banned outright," Dillon repeated. "Oklahoma State has paddles that were given a noisemaker exemption back in 2012.
(Brendan) Sorsby never played a snap for the Red Raiders, and yet there's a lawsuit. Cincinnati has yet to be touched.
You're selling "greater than 12," why should Texas Tech fans believe it?"
Yormark cut him off with a correction.
"No, I didn't say greater than 12, you misquoted me," Yormark responded. "I said we're going forward as 16 strong, and that's my answer to your question, but thank you for that question."
The back-and-forth came against a tense backdrop around Texas Tech, which has become a lightning rod in college athletics. With player pay now fully legal and transfers open, the Red Raiders have leaned hard into the resources available to them. Booster Cody Campbell, a billionaire oil CEO, has used the portal to help build what the source described as a competitive advantage no other Big 12 program has.
The Sorsby issue Dillon referenced was another flashpoint. The Big 12 sued Texas Tech in June over efforts to avoid the NCAA punishment expected for Sorsby because of his gambling habits. That situation also led to threats from other Big 12 athletic directors that they would not play Texas Tech if Sorsby stayed on the roster.
Yormark’s friction with Texas Tech and Campbell is not new. In April, the two sides clashed on social media after the league scheduled Texas Tech’s game against Houston for a Friday night, a slot that matters deeply to Texas high school football. Yormark told Campbell that he does not run the Big 12, and Campbell answered by reviving the tortilla-throwing tradition the conference had banned in October 2025.
In Other News...
Bearcats Left Hanging Over One Massive Unanswered Gambling Question
Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark wasnt interested in opening the door any wider on Wednesday when asked about the investigation swirling around the University of Cincinnati and former quarterback Brendan Sorsby. The leagues top executive sidestepped the question rather than clarify whether the Bearcats are formally part of any inquiry, leaving the conferences stance as guarded as ever while the issue continues to hover over the program.
For Cincinnati, the unanswered piece is as important as the public statements already on record. The university says it provides gambling education and would not knowingly put an ineligible athlete on the field, but the broader questions around what was known, when it was known and who knew it remain unresolved. Until those details come into focus, this is the kind of story that keeps hanging over a team long after the original news cycle should have moved on. [Read more 🡒]
NCAA Just Pulled Cincinnati Into Brendan Sorsbys Growing Mess
Cincinnatis quarterback room has been pulled into a broader NCAA inquiry after the governing body sent the school a letter of inquiry tied to Brendan Sorsbys gambling activity. The case has widened from a player issue into a program matter, with the Bearcats now facing questions about what was known and when as the investigation continues.
Sorsbys betting history includes wagers he made while he was at Cincinnati, and the scrutiny now follows him into a season where he was one of the programs most visible figures. The unresolved part is the one Cincinnati cares about most: how much the staff knew while he was in the building, and what the NCAA decides that means for the school. [Read more 🡒]