Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark didn’t want to touch the Cincinnati question at media days, and that silence said plenty.
The issue hanging over the conference is Brendan Sorsby, the former Cincinnati quarterback who has alleged in a lawsuit against the NCAA that the university knew about his gambling activity. Cincinnati has said it gives student-athletes extensive gambling education and would never knowingly play an ineligible athlete.
The NCAA said in March it received a tip from an online sports book about Sorsby’s gambling activity, and said the sports book had been alerted by law enforcement. Multiple people told USA TODAY Sports in April that Sorsby was gambling on games and that Cincinnati knew about it in the summer of 2025.
That made Tuesday’s Big 12 media day the obvious place for a direct question. A member of the media asked why Cincinnati was not part of any investigation into Sorsby’s gambling.
Yormark didn’t just dodge it. He turned the exchange into a show.
After opening the day by announcing the Big 12’s new “entitlement” partner would have a patch on the jerseys of all football and men’s and women’s basketball teams in the conference, along with signage on playing fields and courts, Yormark walked toward the reporter and said, “Stand up, ask that question again, and then I’m going to give you the answer I want to give you.”
When the question was repeated, he answered, “We’re going forward as 16 strong and that’s my answer to your question.”
That was it.
The problem is the question isn’t going away. If Cincinnati knew about Sorsby’s gambling and played him anyway, the NCAA should treat that seriously. If it didn’t know, then the university is left hanging while the biggest question in the case stays unanswered.
Sorsby’s lawsuit last month made the matter even messier by saying Cincinnati knew. That came after his agent, Ron Slavin, went on a radio show in Dallas and made the same claim, prompting Cincinnati’s June statement: “All of our student-athletes receive extensive gambling education multiple times throughout the year, and we would never knowingly play an athlete who violated NCAA sports wagering regulations,”
The timeline around the NCAA’s tip also raises questions. The organization said the sports book was alerted by law enforcement, and Sorsby had a gambling problem dating back to 2022, with thousands of bets across multiple accounts.
Cincinnati was also in the middle of an ugly NIL breakup with Sorsby, who owed the university $975,000 to get out of his two-year deal. Sorsby disputed that he owed anything before leaving for Texas Tech, a Big 12 rival.
For now, though, the conference’s official answer is no answer at all. And that’s exactly why the Cincinnati part of this story keeps getting louder.
In Other News...
Big 12 Tension With Texas Tech Just Put Houston Fans On Notice
The Big 12s 2026 media days in Frisco were supposed to be about the leagues next phase, with commissioner Brett Yormark talking up a new Monster Energy partnership, playoff expansion and the conferences stance on sports gambling. But the event also carried the kind of edge that tends to follow Yormark around, especially when Texas Tech is involved, and one exchange with Sean Dillon of Rockin Pregame turned the room back toward the leagues lingering friction points.
Dillon pressed Yormark on how the Big 12 has treated Texas Tech, a question that touched on the programs long list of grievances and the broader sense in Lubbock that the league has not always been even-handed. The tension comes on top of a wider standoff involving Tech booster Cody Campbell, who has sparred with Yormark over scheduling, Friday night games and the schools banned tortilla-throwing tradition, leaving Houston and the rest of the league watching a conference already carrying more than one unresolved fight. [Read more 🡒]
NCAA Just Pulled Cincinnati Into Brendan Sorsbys Growing Mess
Cincinnatis quarterback room has been pulled into a broader NCAA inquiry after the governing body sent the school a letter of inquiry tied to Brendan Sorsbys gambling activity. The case has widened from a player issue into a program matter, with the Bearcats now facing questions about what was known and when as the investigation continues.
Sorsbys betting history includes wagers he made while he was at Cincinnati, and the scrutiny now follows him into a season where he was one of the programs most visible figures. The unresolved part is the one Cincinnati cares about most: how much the staff knew while he was in the building, and what the NCAA decides that means for the school. [Read more 🡒]