The Cubs’ 2026 trade deadline haul was supposed to steady a season that was wobbling in real time. Instead, it may have left the organization staring at a much bigger bill down the road.
Chicago dealt six prospects for three pitchers in a push for help, and all three were active pieces in the stretch run and on the Wild Card roster against the San Diego Padres. But after the Cubs were swept, the moves look a lot less like bold deadline work and a lot more like a set of decisions that could haunt them for years.
Kevin Gausman was the headline addition, and his time with the Cubs came with both usefulness and frustration. He made nine starts, went 5-4, and posted a 4.83 ERA across 50.1 innings. Two outings really dragged the numbers down - six earned runs in four innings against the Milwaukee Brewers on Sept. 9 and six earned runs in 4.2 innings against the Washington Nationals on Aug. 13 - while his other seven starts produced a 3.24 ERA.
Then came the injury. In his final regular-season start, Gausman hurt his left shoulder while lunging for a tag near third base.
He wasn’t fully right for Game 2 against the Padres on Wednesday night, and the Cubs needed him close to perfect. Instead, he allowed two runs in the second inning, and a third crossed after Gavin Sheets homered off Daniel Palencia in the fourth with an inherited runner on base.
Chicago paid for Gausman by sending Brett Bateman and Ty Southisene to the Toronto Blue Jays. Southisene is a 21-year-old infielder the Cubs took in the fourth round in 2024, and he’s still in High-A.
Bateman, meanwhile, has already given Toronto something to watch. The 24-year-old posted a 138 wRC+ and 1.9 fWAR in 41 games.
Bateman was never going to dislodge Pete Crow-Armstrong in center field, and if he had stayed with the Cubs, he would have needed much more power to carve out a corner-outfield role. Even so, his .329/.402/.424 line in 181 plate appearances raises the question of whether he could have helped Chicago later on.
That possibility matters even more with both left field and right field open heading into the offseason, since Ian Happ and Seiya Suzuki are both set for free agency.
Bateman’s .410 BABIP suggests he ran hot, and his batted-ball profile points to major overachievement in his first big-league look. Still, his early production in Toronto is exactly the kind of thing fans will keep tracking.
The Ryan Zeferjahn deal hasn’t produced the same level of immediate concern, but it still came with risk. The right-hander was mostly average out of the Cubs bullpen, putting up a 4.50 ERA in 18 innings.
He struck out 23.8% of hitters, which is solid, but opponents hit .268 against him and he walked 10%. He didn’t exactly deliver a string of clean, confidence-building innings, though he did finish with seven straight scoreless outings, including 1.1 innings against the Padres.
Zeferjahn’s stuff is real - he works in the high 90s and is under team control through 2030 - but relievers are famously volatile, year to year and month to month. That’s what made the price so uncomfortable: Moises Ballesteros and pitching prospect Mason McGwire went to the Los Angeles Angels for him.
So far, that one has not burned the Cubs in obvious fashion. Ballesteros opened 2026 with a strong month, then couldn’t make the adjustment to major league pitching and was demoted in June.
After the trade, he played 45 games for the Angels and hit .199/.260/.280 with three home runs in 177 plate appearances. He struck out 26% of the time and graded poorly behind the plate.
Even so, he’s only 22 and has long been known for his bat-to-ball ability. McGwire, too, was in the middle of a breakout season in the Cubs’ system before the deal. If he develops into a big-league pitcher, that would sting for a club that has not exactly built a spotless record when it comes to developing arms.
The trade that may end up defining all of this is the one for Clay Holmes. Chicago paid a premium for the veteran right-hander, who was one of the most coveted starters available. Holmes gave the Cubs nine starts and turned in a 1.55 ERA over five games in August, but September was a mess: 18 earned runs in 19.2 innings, an 8.24 ERA, and a 16.1% walk rate.
By the time the Cubs reached the Wild Card round, Holmes had become too shaky to trust. Even though he was on the roster in San Diego, Counsell didn’t use him in either game.
That deal also brought in Tyrone Taylor, who was excellent in his two months with the Cubs, but the cost may be what fans remember most. Chicago sent top prospect Jefferson Rojas to the Mets, and that could prove to be the harshest part of the deadline.
Rojas was already having a strong season in the Cubs’ farm system, hitting .799 OPS with 15 home runs in 91 games. He was widely viewed as either the No. 1 or No. 2 prospect in the organization, and his stock only climbed after the move. In the Mets’ minor league system, he finished the regular season with 12 home runs in 34 games between Double-A and Triple-A, slashing .293/.346/.629 in 160 plate appearances.
Maybe the Cubs bring Holmes back and he helps settle a rotation that still looks shaky heading into 2027. But with the way these deals have unfolded, it’s hard to shake the feeling that Chicago may have ended up on the wrong side of a trade - one involving a future star and a deadline swing that looked necessary at the time.
In Other News...
Pete Crow-Armstrong Just Put Cubs Fans On Notice About October
Pete Crow-Armstrong spent the regular season giving the Cubs a dynamic presence at the top of the lineup, but October arrived with a much harsher spotlight. Chicagos Wild Card Series loss to the Padres was lopsided from the start, with the Cubs dropping Game 1, 8-1, and Game 2, 4-1, and their offense never finding much rhythm against San Diego. For a club that leaned on Crow-Armstrong all year, his struggles stood out even more in a short series that left little room for recovery.
Crow-Armstrong went 0 for 15 with eight strikeouts, a blunt reminder of how quickly the postseason can flatten even the most productive regular-season stretch. He acknowledged afterward that he did not contribute the way he wanted and said the ending left him personally disappointed, a frustrating finish for a player who has become central to the Cubs future. For a team that expects bigger October moments ahead, his comments landed as both a reflection and a warning about how thin the margin is when the calendar turns. [Read more 🡒]
Ian Happ Just Turned A Painful Cubs Question Into A Real One
The Cubs postseason ended in a hurry with a wild-card sweep by the Padres, but the conversation around the roster has already shifted to something bigger than October. Ian Happ, who has spent his entire 10-year major league career in Chicago, is headed toward free agency this offseason, and the possibility of him leaving the only organization he has known has become one of the teams most emotional questions.
Happs attachment to the Cubs is obvious, and Dansby Swanson has been among the teammates making clear how much he means in the clubhouse and on the field. For now, there is plenty of speculation that a return could still happen, maybe even on a hometown discount, but the reality is that a player who has been part of this core for years is suddenly staring at a decision that could reshape both his future and the Cubs offseason. [Read more 🡒]
Jed Hoyer Faces Painful Cubs Calls As Brewers Gap Still Looms
The Cubs ended the season with a playoff berth, but the winter ahead still looks like a reckoning for Jed Hoyer and the front office. Chicago showed enough to get back into the postseason picture, yet not enough to be viewed as a true World Series threat, which leaves the organization in the familiar spot of trying to balance immediate competitiveness with longer-term roster planning.
That means some uncomfortable calls are coming on the pitching side, where names like Matthew Boyd, Kevin Gausman and Hunter Harvey are already part of the offseason conversation as possible departures or trade pieces. The Brewers still loom in the division picture, and the Cubs are now staring at a 2027 roster puzzle that could force them to reshape more than a few parts of the club before they can realistically close that gap. [Read more 🡒]