Nick Wright isn’t buying the cleanest version of Michael Jordan’s playoff story.
On the latest episode of What’s Wright? With Nick Wright, the FS1 host pushed back hard on the idea that Jordan never had rough postseason stretches, calling that notion “laughable” and pointing to several games that don’t fit the myth.
“The idea that Jordan never had bad playoff moments is, of course, laughable, but folks will consider it gospel,” Wright said. He then walked through a few of the moments he believes get glossed over, starting with the Bulls’ 1989 Eastern Conference Finals matchup with Detroit.
Wright focused on Game 4 and Game 5 of that series. In Game 4, Chicago was up 2-1 and Jordan went 5-15.
In Game 5, he said, Jordan was 4-8 from the field in a critical road game as the Pistons won and then took the next game as well. Wright also pointed to the next year against Detroit, when Jordan went 7-19 in another pivotal Game 5 and the Bulls lost the series in seven.
That 1989 Game 5 stands out most because Jordan took only eight shots. He finished with 18 points, five rebounds, nine assists and one steal in a 94-85 loss. Wright framed it as a moment where Jordan didn’t rise to the occasion, though the numbers also show a night when Detroit forced the ball out of his hands after he had already lit them up for 46 points in Game 3.
Wright then moved to the 1993 Eastern Conference Finals against the New York Knicks, a series that has been packaged differently in The Last Dance. He said the documentary made it feel like Jordan was under siege after going to Atlantic City and then answered with a huge scoring outburst, but Wright argued that sequence wasn’t accurate.
“It’s hard to find a bad playoff moment until we get to the game that is lost to history,” Wright said. “And this is the one that I just can’t get over because The Last Dance tricked you on it. So if you watched The Last Dance right before Jordan retired the first time, they are going for their third straight title.
“They have lost back-to-back games to the Knicks, and MJ in those two games shot 37% from the field in both,” Wright continued. “They are down 0-2. Jordan is talking about all of the scrutiny and pressure, and he is getting killed in the media because he was in Atlantic City gambling all night, okay?
“They go back to Chicago,” Wright continued. “They are down 0-2.
Their season is on the line. And Michael Jordan goes 3-18, but they win ’cause [Scottie] Pippen’s unbelievable, and in the next game he scores 54… The Last Dance made you think they’re down 0-2, he’s getting killed for gambling all night, and then drops the 54 points.
That’s not what happened.”
Wright’s target there was Game 3 of that series, when Jordan shot 3-18 but still helped the Bulls survive with 22 points, eight rebounds, 11 assists, two steals and two blocks. Scottie Pippen carried a huge load too, finishing with 29 points on 10-12 shooting, four rebounds, four assists and one steal.
Wright said the roughest stretch came in 1995, when Jordan returned from retirement and the Bulls were eliminated by the Orlando Magic in the Eastern Conference Semifinals. He didn’t give Jordan a pass for coming back from baseball.
“The real answer is twofold on did Jordan have rough playoff moments,” Wright said. “The real answer is when he came back from baseball, the series against the Magic, he was not good.
And people thought the Bulls were going to win that series. He had a 40-point game in that series and another 38-point game early in that series.
“And then at the tail end of that series, he was not good,” Wright continued. “And in the game they got eliminated he was outright bad.
He had a half dozen turnovers, he was 8-19 from the field. He got stripped at the end, and they lost.”
Wright also brought up the final three games of the 1996 NBA Finals against Seattle, when Jordan averaged 23.7 points while shooting 36.7% from the field after Gary Payton took over the defensive assignment following Game 3. Chicago had already seized control by then, winning the first three games and eventually closing out the series in six.
Wright’s larger point was simple: Jordan was brilliant, but he wasn’t spotless. And on that, he’s not interested in hearing otherwise.
In Other News...
Zach LaVine May Have Just Changed How Bulls Fans See Him
Zach LaVines exit from Chicago already gave Bulls fans plenty to sort through, and the trade return from Sacramento added another layer to the conversation. In the three-team deal, the Bulls came away with Kevin Huerter, Zach Collins, Tre Jones and the pick used to select Noa Essengue, a package that at least gave the franchise something tangible to build around after moving on from one of its most recognizable scorers.
What has kept LaVine in the spotlight since then is the sense that his next move says as much about his outlook as his on-court production. Sacramento is not viewed as a title favorite, which is why his decision has sparked so much speculation about where winning ranks among his priorities and whether the chase for a championship is still driving his career choices the way some had assumed. [Read more 🡒]
Bulls Could Be Pulled Into A Jonathan Kuminga Move With Real Stakes
A potential Jonathan Kuminga sign-and-trade has started to sound less like a two-team problem and more like the kind of cap puzzle that can pull a third club into the middle of it. According to ESPNs Bobby Marks, the Lakers have already used all of their available 2026 salary cap space, which is why a more complicated framework is being discussed with the Hawks and, possibly, Chicago helping make the math work.
For the Bulls, the appeal would be less about chasing a headline and more about using their available tools to fill an open roster spot while adding shooting and depth. In the hypothetical setup, Chicago would help route contracts through the deal and could wind up with Dalton Knecht and Corey Kispert, but the whole structure still sits in the speculative stage as front offices weigh whether the cap flexibility is worth the moving parts. [Read more 🡒]