The Bears didn’t just tinker at safety - they wiped the slate clean. Kevin Byard and Jaquan Brisker are gone, and Chicago has replaced them with Coby Bryant and Dillon Thieneman.
On paper, that kind of turnover can look like a gamble. In this case, it may be the rare overhaul that actually strengthens both now and later.
Matt Verderame of Sports Illustrated put it plainly: "Poles replaced a first-team All-Pro with a rookie, and a stalwart with a signing. Sounds risky, but the moves are well-positioned to work."
That’s the headline version. The details make the case even better.
Brisker, despite the reputation attached to him, never really settled into the kind of dependable starter the Bears could count on. He missed four starts in his first two seasons, dealt with a string of smaller injuries in his second year, and then played only five games in 2024.
Even if 2025 was his best season, the people who drafted and developed him were no longer in the building. The coaching staff that inherited him saw an injury-prone player who still hadn’t taken the next step.
That showed up in free agency. Brisker landed a one-year, $5.5M deal, which is not the kind of number teams hand out to a player they view as a locked-in starter.
Bryant’s contract tells a very different story. He got three years and $40M, or $13.3M per year. That’s a major jump from Brisker’s market, and it reflects how the league values the new piece in Chicago.
Byard’s market also puts the Bears’ decision in perspective. The 33-year-old All-Pro signed for one year and $7M after a 2025 season that was seen as a flash, one built more on interceptions than on consistently strong play. Add Brisker and Byard together, and they came in at $12.5M per year.
So the choice is pretty stark: either Chicago overpaid Bryant, or the rest of the NFL is basically agreeing that the Bears upgraded the spot.
The rookie side of the move makes sense, too. If Bryant is the younger answer where Byard used to be, then Dillon Thieneman steps in as the Brisker replacement. Given Brisker’s injuries and the fit issues in this defense, the drop-off may not be nearly as steep as it looks at first glance.
And with Thieneman’s draft pedigree in the mix, the safety room doesn’t just look different. It looks better.
In Other News...
Bears Just Got Another Reason To Worry About Left Tackle
An injury to Ozzy Trapilo has shifted the Bears left tackle picture again, and now the focus is back on Theo Benedet and Braxton Jones as training camp approaches. Benedet enters the competition as an undrafted player who has already started eight NFL games, while Jones brings the more established rsum and the kind of experience that usually matters most when a line spot is up for grabs.
Benedet at least has a lane to make this interesting, which is more than most depth linemen get this time of year. Jones still looks like the favorite, but the Bears need stability on the edge and the job is now set up as a real camp battle, with Benedet trying to turn his opportunity into something more than a temporary mention on the depth chart. [Read more 🡒]
These 4 Bears Backups Could Decide How Far 2026 Goes
The Bears 2026 outlook may hinge less on the headline names and more on the depth chart behind them, where a few younger backups are positioned to matter in a hurry. Austin Booker is one of the clearest examples, since his role in the pass rush could grow if Dayo Odeyingbo is not fully healthy, and that kind of spillover can reshape how a defense holds up over the course of a season.
Cole Kmet also sits near the center of the conversation, with his offensive role likely to expand if Colston Loveland is unavailable, while Neville Gallimore was brought in to add needed defensive line depth. Then there is Zavion Thomas, whose speed gives Chicago another flexible piece to consider on special teams and offense, a useful sort of insurance if the Bears need answers from unexpected places. [Read more 🡒]