A 24-team playoff in college football is not the threat some people think it is. If anything, it could make the sport better for BYU, Utah and everybody else.
The loudest objections usually come in two forms: that the postseason will get watered down, and that the regular season will lose its edge. But that fear misses how fans actually watch football, and how the sport already works at the highest level.
The NFL doesn’t suffer because more teams have a path into the postseason. It thrives.
Regular-season games still matter, especially when rivals like the Packers and the Bears, the Steelers and the Ravens, the Cowboys and the Eagles, or the Chiefs and the Raiders meet. The stakes don’t vanish just because the playoff field is larger.
The same would be true in college football.
Fans don’t stop caring because a team has a wider margin for error. Team pride is still on the line, and there is no guarantee any one squad will make the field in a given year.
In fact, a bigger playoff could keep more fan bases engaged longer. A loss or two wouldn’t automatically end the season, and that means more teams would still have something meaningful to chase.
Conference champions would get first-round byes, and seeding would determine home-field advantage, adding another layer to the race.
The regular season would still deliver what makes college football compelling in the first place: the talent, the strategy, the pageantry and the fun. Quality matchups would remain worth watching even if every game is not carrying the same do-or-die weight.
The bigger payoff is what a 24-team format could do for access. College football has long depended too heavily on opinion when it comes to postseason selection, and the sport’s coast-to-coast setup makes it hard for the best teams to line up against each other during the regular season. A larger bracket would create more must-win games between top teams, and more chances for teams to settle things on the field.
Opinion would still matter in choosing the 24, but it would matter less than it does now with 12 teams, or when the field was four or two. A wider playoff would give more deserving teams a real shot to prove themselves.
That matters for programs like BYU and Utah, which have had to watch playoff invitations go to teams with similar records while they were left out. Expansion gives those schools and their fans a better reason to believe they can earn their way in rather than be brushed aside by a committee.
Yes, money is part of the equation. That’s no surprise. But the sport already lives in that world.
There are drawbacks that could come with expansion, but there is also precedent. FCS football has used an expanded playoff for decades, and it has worked. Meanwhile, at the FBS level, teams that miss out often end up in bowl games that don’t carry much weight, and plenty of players have opted out of those lesser bowls anyway.
So don’t panic about playoff inflation. Don’t worry that the regular season will suddenly lose its meaning.
A 24-team playoff would give more schools a chance to earn their way in, prove it on the field and, if everything breaks right, win the whole durn thing.
In Other News...
BYUs UCF Win Looks Different After The Knights Ugly Reality Check
BYUs win over UCF suddenly carries a different kind of weight after the Knights followed that double-overtime thriller with a sobering 41-9 loss to Baylor. What looked at the time like a tough road result against a dangerous opponent now sits in a sharper light, especially with UCFs offense sputtering to a season-low output and failing to find the end zone at all.
Baylor also exposed just how much ground UCF still has to cover in the trenches, piling up 501 yards and seven sacks against the Knights offensive line. The blowout got worse when Keyone Jenkins left with an ankle injury, leaving UCF with more questions than answers heading into the next stretch and giving BYU a little more perspective on what that earlier matchup really meant. [Read more 🡒]
BYU Escaped A Scare And Now Everything Points To Utah
BYU got what it needed at LaVell Edwards Stadium, but not without a few tense moments along the way. The Cougars held off Arizona State 27-20 behind Bear Bachmeiers 236 passing yards and a touchdown, while Sione Moa powered the ground game with two rushing scores, a combination that helped BYU move to 7-1 overall and 4-1 in Big 12 play.
Now the focus shifts to a rivalry game that has a way of revealing exactly how far a team has come. BYU has banked another league win and kept its place near the top of the conference race, but the margin for error is shrinking as the calendar turns toward Utah and all the noise that comes with it. [Read more 🡒]
BYU Win Over Arizona State Just Sparked A Big 12 Debate
BYUs 27-20 win over Arizona State is already the sort of result that can linger around a conference for a while, and now it has an officiating wrinkle attached to it. The Big 12 acknowledged that a touchdown was incorrectly awarded after a fumble recovery, when the proper ruling should have given BYU possession at the spot of the recovery instead of the end zone finish.
The mistake matters because the seven points attached to the play matched the final margin, which is exactly the kind of detail that tends to fuel debate long after the game ends. For BYU, the win still stands, but the conferences admission ensures this one will be remembered not just for the result, but for the call that helped shape it. [Read more 🡒]