Brian Windhorst and Tim MacMahon think the Clippers’ Kawhi Leonard mess traces back to something bigger than one bad decision: a franchise obsessed with shaking the Lakers’ shadow.
On a recent episode of “The Hoop Collective,” the two NBA insiders compared the Clippers to the Nets, arguing that both teams have shown a kind of “little brother syndrome” in the face of bigger, more established local rivals. Windhorst said a longtime league source told him, “the Clippers were guilty of the same thing that the Nets were.
They had little brother syndrome. And they really tried to- they were so focused on not being the little brother anymore that they took way too big gambles.”
MacMahon pointed to the Nets’ swing for the fences in two separate waves, first with the KG-Pierce deal and later with the trio of KD, Kyrie, and James Harden. He then said the Clippers would have made the Kawhi Leonard move too, especially with Leonard “fresh off a Finals MVP” and Paul George coming off a First Team All-NBA season.
Still, he said the issue wasn’t just the decision itself, but how far the team pushed to make it happen. “You can quibble with the price, and obviously, even before all these penalties, the price-it completely blew up in their face and paved the way for OKC to have a championship team and the potential dynasty.”
MacMahon added, “But little brother syndrome, absolutely trying to fast-forward. No question about it. But it’s not like at the time people were questioning, “Why would you do Kawhi Leonard and Paul George?””
Windhorst connected that mindset to how the Clippers presented themselves publicly. He said the Nets moved to Brooklyn and tried to announce themselves with Jay-Z billboards outside the Garden, while the Clippers did something similar in Los Angeles.
“Now, they shared the same arena, but, like, they went a whole campaign, ‘LA Our Way,’ you know, they changed their name from the Los Angeles Clippers to the LA Clippers. And, you know, they built their own arena and said, “We’re, you know, we’re going to be bigger and better.””
He said both clubs were chasing the team in their own market that had already set the standard. “And they were chasing [the Lakers].
Both teams had some bad luck. Obviously, Kawhi’s injuries, you know, who knows what would have happened, Paul George’s injuries, but there was hubris that contributed to both of these teams stubbing their toes.”
MacMahon agreed that injuries mattered, citing Kyrie’s injury and James Harden’s injury for the Nets. But he also said the deeper issue was desperation.
“And for the Clippers, they had a stretch of relevancy with the Lob City Clippers. They just couldn’t break through.
And then Ballmer basically decided that no matter what it took, no matter what rules needed to be broken, no matter what trade needed to be made, you know, whatever it took, he was going to get Kawhi Leonard.”
He described the resulting structure as a disaster, saying, “the power structure of the Clippers was Kawhi/Uncle Dennis at the top and then Ballmer and then downhill, and that was an epic disaster.”
Joey Linn, who covers the Clippers, made a similar argument in his own reporting. He wrote that the team’s “inferiority complex” toward the Lakers helped push it toward trying to get around the league’s salary cap rules in the pursuit of Kawhi Leonard.
“When one of the richest men in America gets caught circumventing the NBA’s salary cap, it inevitably becomes a story about money and power. Ironically, this story is more about insecurity and a “little brother syndrome” so severe that it allowed a player and his uncle to call the shots,” he wrote.
Linn added, “Whether it’s driven by the Lakers’ shadow, five decades of losing, or some combination of both, the Clippers under Steve Ballmer have often operated as a deeply insecure organization.”
He expanded on that view in an interview on SiriusXM Radio, saying his experience around the team had reinforced the point.
“This is an organization that has done a lot of things well… But this is also an organization, and whether they want to admit it or not, it has operated as if it’s trying to get out of the Lakers’ shadow.”
He pointed to the “LA Our Way” campaign after the Leonard acquisition and said the issue ran deeper than branding. Linn also said he had seen tactics from the Clippers side that he described as unlike what he had seen from other professional sports organizations.
“And some of the things that go on, in terms of the tactics that are used on the Clippers’ side of things, aren’t typical of what you would see from a professional sports organization. And that’s where it seems like an insecurity problem.”
He finished by saying that kind of approach appears to come from the top. “So that definitely seems like the root of all of this,” Linn concluded.
The broad media read is clear: the Clippers’ desire to catch the Lakers pushed them into dangerous territory, with Kawhi Leonard at the center of it. And with a new arena in place, the franchise is now trying to build its own identity - even if matching the Lakers’ history is still a long way off.
In Other News...
Nets Rebuild Could Force Some Uncomfortable Expansion Draft Decisions
If the NBA does move toward expansion by the 2026-27 season, the Nets could find themselves in an uncomfortable spot, forced to sort through a roster that is still very much in the middle of a rebuild. The scenario has already prompted some early guesswork from analysts Dan Favale and Grant Hughes, who looked at how Brooklyn might handle an expansion draft modeled after the leagues 2004 rules, with contract status and long-term team direction both factoring into the decision-making.
The exercise is especially relevant now because commissioner Adam Silver has recently spoken about the possibility of expansion, including the kind of new-market buzz that comes with cities like Las Vegas. For Brooklyn, the challenge would not just be losing a player, but deciding which pieces are truly worth shielding when the bigger goal is to keep the rebuild moving without getting caught flat-footed if the league adds another team or two. [Read more 🡒]
Nets Face A Defining Choice With No Clear Franchise Star
The Nets are heading into next season with a roster that does not yet feature an obvious franchise centerpiece, and that alone puts a different kind of pressure on Brooklyns front office. With the team projected to sit near the bottom of the Eastern Conference and its first-round pick tied up by a swap right owned by Houston, the usual incentives around simply waiting for the draft are not there in the same way.
That leaves the organization weighing a more aggressive path, one that would involve using its flexibility to chase a star through the trade market and give the roster a better chance to get back to the postseason. There is some protection in the setup, too, since the Nets have room to maneuver on contracts and limited downside if the year goes sideways, but the bigger question is whether they decide this is the moment to act or another season to keep building. [Read more 🡒]
Julius Randle Is Selling A Much Higher Nets Ceiling Than Expected
Julius Randle is already setting a different tone around the Nets, and it is not the cautious kind that often follows a roster reset. Brooklyns newest addition said the group has a chance to finish well above outside expectations this season, pointing to the work ethic and basketball IQ he has seen from the teams younger players. He also made it clear he sees a natural offensive fit with Michael Porter Jr., a pairing that could help the Nets create easier scoring chances if the pieces come together.
Still, optimism does not erase the questions hanging over the roster. Brooklyn has improved, but the defense remains a concern and the broader projection still has the team in play-in territory at best. Randles belief in a higher ceiling gives the Nets a more interesting storyline than the forecast suggests, but the real test will be whether that confidence shows up once the games start to matter. [Read more 🡒]