People have been quick to pile on the Celtics after the Jaylen Brown trade, but one of the loudest arguments floating around doesn’t hold up: the idea that the Clippers somehow did better in the Kawhi Leonard deal than Boston did moving Brown. On paper, the Clippers got a bigger haul. In reality, that’s not the same thing as getting the better return.
Here’s how the two trades break down.
The Kawhi trade sent Leonard to the Raptors and brought the Clippers Brandon Ingram, two first-round picks in 2031 and 2033, a 2027 first-round pick swap, and two second-round picks in 2030 and 2033.
The Jaylen trade sent Brown to the 76ers and brought the Celtics Paul George, a 2031 first-round pick, a 2028 first-round pick or swap, and two second-round picks in 2028 and 2030.
The first thing that jumps out is that Paul George is still better than Brandon Ingram. Ingram was an all-star last year, but the source of the skepticism around him is clear: he’s not efficient, he’s a playoff dropper, and his impact on winning is suspect. The same concerns Boston just attached to Brown apply even more to Ingram.
He can score and create tough shots, but that’s not the whole job. He doesn’t offer much defensively or away from the ball. He’s younger and a little cheaper, but the durability questions are still there, and he’s likely headed for another big contract soon.
George is far from his peak, but he remains an excellent two-way player who should accept his role and still matter to winning at a high level. If Boston keeps him fresh and manages his minutes, he should be a strong addition. The Clippers, by contrast, would have a much harder time saying the same about Ingram.
The real debate, though, is the draft capital. That’s where the confusion comes from, because the Clippers did receive more picks. But this is a case where quantity doesn’t tell the whole story.
The swap in the Kawhi deal is close to meaningless. Unless something wild happens, the Raptors are expected to be much better than the Clippers, which means Los Angeles probably won’t even use it.
Boston’s swap is different. It gives the Celtics the more favorable of the Clippers’ or 76ers’ picks in 2028, and the Clippers are still projected to be pretty bad.
That could turn into a very valuable selection.
The two firsts the Clippers got from Toronto also look less exciting when you zoom in. The Raptors have put together a strong young group with Scottie Barnes, Collin Murray-Boyles, and others. Even if Leonard is gone by 2030, Toronto still looks positioned to stay competitive, which means those picks could land late in the first round.
Boston’s 2031 first from Philadelphia carries more upside. The 76ers are all-in around three huge contracts - Tyrese Maxey, Jaylen Brown, and Joel Embiid - and all three expire in three years. If that setup goes sideways, Philly could be staring at a rebuild by the end of the decade, and that would leave the Celtics holding a potentially valuable pick.
The second-rounders lean Boston’s way too. The Clippers’ two seconds both come from Toronto, a team that will be trying to win.
Boston’s two seconds are each the most favorable option among the three teams involved. Second-round picks are always a guessing game, but three chances at something useful beats one.
So yes, the Clippers technically got more in the Kawhi Leonard trade. But more isn’t always better. In this case, the Celtics’ return for Jaylen Brown looks stronger because the pieces they got have more upside where it matters most.
In Other News...
Celtics Already Linked To Another Young Piece After Brown Shock
With Jaylen Brown no longer in the picture, Bostons roster questions are shifting fast, and the front office may not be done looking for young, versatile help. One of the clearest issues is at power forward, where the Celtics are thin enough that Jayson Tatum and Sam Hauser are projected to absorb most of those minutes, with Paul George at the 4 also in the mix if the team chooses to go that route.
That has naturally pushed Boston toward the kind of multi-position, two-way pieces that can help stabilize the rotation without forcing a bigger overhaul. Around the league, there is already some belief the Celtics could explore options in that mold, but any real pursuit will depend on whether another team is willing to move a player it still sees as part of its long-term core. [Read more 🡒]
Brad Stevens May Have Quietly Solved A Celtics Problem Nobody Saw
Brad Stevens spent the offseason quietly reshaping the Celtics frontcourt, and the work may matter more than it first looked. Boston brought in Mitchell Robinson, then locked up Neemias Queta and Ron Harper Jr., giving the roster a different kind of depth around the basket without making the kind of splash that usually dominates summer headlines.
The appeal is in the cost as much as the fit. Steph Nohs salary model paints Queta as a major value on his new extension, while Harper Jr. landed a four-year deal that still leaves the Celtics with room to breathe. For a team always balancing talent with the cap, those moves could end up looking like one of the cleaner roster wins of the offseason. [Read more 🡒]
Jayson Tatum Finally Addressed The End Of The Two Jays
The end of the Two Jays era has landed hard in Boston, and Jayson Tatum has now spoken publicly about it for the first time. At an event tied to his children's book, Tatum acknowledged how difficult the change has been, offering the first real glimpse of how he is processing the breakup of the partnership that helped define the Celtics' rise.
Tatum and Jaylen Brown were the face of the franchise through two trips to the NBA Finals, and their run together reached its peak with the 2024 title, when Brown took home Finals MVP honors. Even with that shared history in the rearview, the emotional weight of what comes next is still settling in, and Tatum's comments only underline how much Boston's identity has shifted. [Read more 🡒]