Alabama Hits Major Roadblock Trying to Bring Back Former NBA Hopeful

Alabamas high-stakes gamble with NCAA rules in the Charles Bediako saga reveals the limits of its usual influence-and the consequences of overreach.

Charles Bediako Ruled Ineligible: What It Means for Alabama Basketball and Nate Oats’ Program

For Alabama basketball and head coach Nate Oats, the Charles Bediako situation just hit a hard stop. A judge has officially ruled Bediako ineligible to play the rest of the season, shutting down a comeback attempt that’s been clouded in controversy from the start.

Let’s break down what happened, what it means for the Crimson Tide, and why this decision could have ripple effects across the college basketball landscape.

The Attempted Return

Charles Bediako left Alabama in 2023 with his sights set on the NBA. That dream didn’t pan out, and after going undrafted and not securing a long-term professional opportunity, he and his camp sought a return to college basketball - specifically, back to Tuscaloosa.

The problem? He had already forfeited his college eligibility by declaring for the draft and pursuing a pro career. That’s where the legal battle began.

Bediako’s legal team argued that without a scholarship, he couldn’t continue his education - a claim that rang hollow to some, considering he voluntarily gave up that scholarship the first time around. Oats and Alabama’s side tried to frame the situation by comparing it to European players who come to the NCAA after playing professionally overseas. But there’s a key difference: those players hadn’t previously used up their NCAA eligibility.

The Court’s Ruling

On Monday, Judge Daniel Pruet denied the injunction that would have allowed Bediako to continue playing this season. The decision came after a prior ruling - initially in Bediako’s favor - was overturned when the original judge, who had ties to Alabama athletics, recused himself from the case.

That twist added fuel to an already heated situation. Auburn assistant coach Steven Pearl had previously called the whole scenario a “slippery slope,” and it’s not hard to see why. If Bediako had been allowed to return, it could have opened the door for other former pros to try and re-enter the college game, potentially undermining the NCAA’s eligibility rules.

The Fallout

Here’s where things get messy for Alabama: Bediako already played in five games this season, including Saturday’s high-stakes rivalry win over Auburn. He scored 12 points in that one, helping the Crimson Tide secure a 96-92 victory in a hostile environment at Neville Arena.

That win - and the others he participated in - now come with an asterisk. The NCAA has yet to announce any retroactive punishments, but the use of an ineligible player typically leads to vacated wins or other sanctions. That’s a headache no team wants heading into the stretch run of the season.

The Broader Implications

This isn’t the first time Alabama basketball has found itself in the spotlight for off-court controversies. But this situation is different - it’s not about what a player did off the court, it’s about the program’s decision to put him back on it.

There’s also the matter of precedent. The NCAA siding with the court’s decision reinforces its stance on eligibility rules and sends a clear message: once you go pro, there’s no turning back. That may seem harsh, but it’s a line that protects the integrity of the college game.

For Nate Oats, the challenge now is twofold. First, he has to navigate the rest of the season without a player he clearly hoped would be a difference-maker down the stretch. Second, he’ll have to answer questions - from fans, media, and maybe even the NCAA - about why the program put itself in this position in the first place.

What’s Next for Bediako?

As for Charles Bediako, his college career appears to be over - again. Whether he finds another shot professionally or shifts focus elsewhere, his brief return to Alabama will likely be remembered more for the controversy than the on-court contributions.

It’s a tough ending for a player who once showed real promise in the SEC. But the rules are the rules, and in this case, the system held firm.

Final Thoughts

In a college basketball season already filled with drama, this storyline stands out as a cautionary tale. Alabama took a gamble by playing Bediako, hoping the legal battle would break their way. It didn’t.

Now, the Tide are left to regroup - without their big man, without those five games fully intact, and with more questions than answers.