The Atlanta Hawks have already moved on from Zaccharie Risacher, and that makes the old 2024 draft question hit even harder: what if they had taken Alex Sarr instead?
Atlanta sent Risacher to the Dallas Mavericks in a three-team deal, ending the former No. 1 overall pick’s run with the Hawks far earlier than anyone expected. That kind of move naturally sends the conversation back to draft night, when Sarr was seen as a real contender for the top spot before the Washington Wizards took him at No. 2.
At the time, there were fit concerns. Sarr’s camp reportedly did not view Atlanta as the best landing spot, and his preference to spend less time at center raised questions about how he would mesh with the Hawks’ frontcourt. Two years later, though, that hypothetical looks a lot different.
Sarr just put together a strong season, averaging 16.3 points, 7.4 rebounds and 2.7 assists per game while continuing to flash the athleticism, length and rim protection that made him such a prized prospect. That’s the kind of player who can change the feel of a roster.
For Atlanta, the appeal is obvious. A front line built around Jalen Johnson, Sarr and Onyeka Okongwu would give Quin Snyder a huge amount of size, mobility and defensive flexibility.
It would also pair nicely with the perimeter stoppers the Hawks have already added. With Dyson Daniels, Lu Dort and Nickeil Alexander-Walker in front of him, Sarr could have been the last line of resistance, turning the paint into a headache for opposing offenses.
He would not have needed to carry the scoring load either. With Johnson leading the offense, Sarr could have leaned into the parts of his game that fit best: finishing around the rim, running the floor and knocking down shots when the opportunity opened up. That kind of role would have let Atlanta use his tools without asking him to be something he isn’t.
There would still be lineup questions, especially next to Okongwu. The spacing could get tight depending on the matchup. But Snyder would not have had to keep them on the floor together for long stretches, and Sarr’s versatility would have given the Hawks room to mix and match frontcourt looks while keeping size and rim protection on the court.
Would that have turned Atlanta into a title favorite? Probably not. But adding Sarr to the roster the Hawks have built now could have given them one of the most exciting young frontcourts in the Eastern Conference and pushed their case as a possible top-three seed.
None of that is meant to bury Risacher. He had real flashes as a rookie and put together several strong scoring nights, even if the consistency never quite matched what Atlanta needed and his role shrank under Snyder. He’s still young enough to become a very good NBA player, and the move to Dallas gives him a new setting to grow in.
It’s also fair to note that there’s no guarantee Atlanta would have taken Sarr even if Saleh had been running basketball operations then. Different front offices grade players differently, and the same questions about Sarr’s preferred position and fit would have been there either way.
Still, the trade brings the debate back into focus. The Hawks used the No. 1 pick on a player who is no longer part of their future, while Sarr has grown into the kind of young big man who looks tailor-made for the roster Atlanta has since assembled.
The organization has already turned the page. Saleh has reworked the group around Johnson with additions like Dort, Alexander-Walker, rookie guard Kingston Flemings and other pieces that fit the direction Atlanta is chasing.
Draft what-ifs never really go away, especially when the No. 1 pick is involved. Sarr in a Hawks uniform will remain a tempting thought, but Atlanta is clearly focused on what comes next. In that sense, the decisions Saleh makes now matter a lot more than the one the Hawks could have made two years ago.
In Other News...
Hawks Could Solve A Backcourt Problem In One Proposed Deal
Jonathan Kuminga is still on the market after Atlanta declined his team option, and that alone has kept his name tied to a few different roster discussions around the league. The Hawks, Kings and Blazers have all come up in speculative trade frameworks that would reshape each team in different ways, with the idea of a sign-and-trade giving Atlanta another route to adjust its backcourt and keep flexibility in how it builds around the roster.
One of the more interesting angles is how a deal like that could address an obvious need without forcing the Hawks into a full reset. Atlanta has been exploring ways to balance immediate help with long-term movement, and Kuminga's unsettled status leaves the door open for that kind of maneuvering. For now, though, it remains exactly that - a proposal, not a finished transaction - which means the real answer still depends on whether the teams involved are willing to turn the speculation into something official. [Read more 🡒]
Hawks Just Set Up A Bigger Jalen Johnson Decision
Atlantas latest front-office move is as much about the future as the present. Jock Landale is coming in on a one-year deal to give the Hawks some depth behind their bigs, but the signing also fits neatly into the teams larger plan of keeping its books movable. For a roster trying to stay competitive while building around Jalen Johnson, that kind of flexibility matters just as much as immediate production.
Landale is expected to provide minutes, size and a veteran presence while helping younger players along, but the real value may come later. The Hawks continue to operate with an eye on the trade deadline, where an expiring deal can become useful currency if the right star becomes available. In other words, this is another sign that Atlanta is still searching for the best way to put a true co-star next to Johnson. [Read more 🡒]
Lu Dort Gives Hawks A Closing Lineup Fans Will Want To See
The Hawks have given Quin Snyder another late-game defensive lever in Lu Dort, and that alone changes the conversation around how Atlanta can finish games. Dorts arrival adds to a group that already includes Dyson Daniels, Nickeil Alexander-Walker, Jalen Johnson and Onyeka Okongwu, giving Snyder more ways to build a closing five that can pressure the ball, switch across positions and protect the rim without sacrificing too much size.
What makes this especially interesting is the flexibility it creates from game to game. Some matchups may call for a heavier dose of perimeter defense, while others could push Atlanta toward a group that keeps more creation on the floor, and Dorts versatility helps bridge that gap. The trade-off is obvious enough, but so is the appeal: the Hawks now have enough defensive pieces that the best closing lineup may depend less on who is available and more on which version Snyder wants to put in front of an opponent. [Read more 🡒]