Alabama State is moving on from its NCAA case, but not quietly.
The university has accepted the Committee on Infractions ruling that places the school on three years of probation, levies a $30,000 fine, and adds a financial penalty equal to 1% of the football program’s budget. There will be no appeal. Even so, Alabama State’s leaders are making clear they believe the punishment landed harder than it should have.
At the center of the case is a former Alabama State sports information director who altered one football student-athlete’s participation statistics on the athletics website during the 2019 season, reportedly at the direction of the former head football coach. The NCAA treated that as intentional misconduct involving official competition records and, while it reduced the matter from Level I Aggravated to Level I Mitigated, still classified it as a Level I violation.
That classification is exactly where Alabama State takes issue.
“The Committee's reduction confirms what we have maintained from the outset - this case was improperly elevated,” Alabama State Vice President and Director of Athletics Dr. Jason Cable said.
“The underlying conduct, tied to the former Sports Information Director and head coach, simply does not justify placement among the most severe cases in collegiate athletics. While we recognize the adjustment, we firmly believe the record supports a further reduction.”
The school’s argument is not just about the label. It’s about the contrast with Arizona, which was cited for a Level III violation and fined $500 after certifying and playing the same student-athlete at the center of the investigation.
That player was former Alabama State running back Jacory Croskey-Merritt, who transferred to New Mexico before joining Arizona for the 2024 season. After Croskey-Merritt rushed for 106 yards and a touchdown in Arizona’s first game against New Mexico, questions surfaced about how many games he had played in 2019 at Alabama State. The key issue was whether he appeared in four games or eight, a distinction that would determine whether he retained his redshirt season.
Arizona had certified Croskey-Merritt’s eligibility using the records available at the time, and the NCAA ultimately treated that as a minor violation. Alabama State, meanwhile, was hit with one of the NCAA’s most serious classifications.
“This outcome reflects a significant disparity,” Alabama State President Dr. Quinton T.
Ross Jr. said. “The certifying institution received a minor infraction, while Alabama State was assigned one of the NCAA's most serious classifications.
We believe the standards should be applied consistently across all institutions, and this case underscores the importance of fairness and accountability throughout the NCAA governance process.”
The NCAA’s enforcement approach explains part of the split. Under its policies, the level of a violation is driven mainly by the conduct itself, not by competitive advantage. The Committee on Infractions viewed intentionally changing an official competition record as fundamentally different from relying on incorrect information during the eligibility process, which is why Alabama State and Arizona ended up in different buckets even though both cases involved Croskey-Merritt.
Still, Alabama State says the punishment does not fit the situation.
Its penalties include probation through 2029, yearly compliance reports, a $30,000 fine, and the additional financial hit tied to the football budget. Arizona’s punishment, by comparison, was a Level III violation and a $500 fine.
“While today's decision is a downgrade from the Level I aggravated classification, we still believe that the scope of penalty does not reflect the university involvement or non-participation in this matter,” Ross said.
The committee also found there was not enough evidence to conclude that the former head football coach personally directed the statistical alteration. Alabama State’s public statement does not name the coach referenced in the NCAA case, though Donald Hill-Eley was the school’s head football coach in 2019.
Alabama State chose the summary disposition route to move the case along and accepted responsibility based on what the investigation uncovered. The university also said it has already put corrective measures in place, and those steps will remain active during the probationary period.
Beyond the sanctions themselves, Alabama State sees the case as part of a larger conversation about NCAA consistency, especially for schools with fewer compliance resources. That debate is already unfolding more broadly, with HBCU leaders and conference commissioners speaking with federal lawmakers about college sports rules and possible changes to NCAA oversight and enforcement.
How member schools read Alabama State’s case - as a one-off or a warning sign - could shape the next round of discussion for FCS programs and HBCUs.
In Other News...
Arizona Basketball Just Dropped A Nonconference Slate Fans Will Debate
Arizona basketballs full nonconference slate is out, and it has the kind of mix that should keep fans arguing from October through December. There are three exhibition games in October, a regular-season opener in Las Vegas against UCLA, and a busy run that also brings in Cal Poly, NAU, Auburn, UConn and a trip to Maui before the calendar turns to the heart of the schedule. It is a slate built to test the Wildcats early, with enough variety in venue and opponent to give the roster a real read before league play arrives.
The intrigue starts right away with that UCLA matchup, which lands as the final game in a three-game series that has already swung both ways. Auburn also comes back onto the schedule in November as the return leg of a home-and-home, adding another measuring-stick game for a team that will not be able to hide from quality competition. By the time Arizona closes nonconference play at home against Northern Illinois and Incarnate Word, the debate will not just be about who the Wildcats played, but what all of it revealed about how ready they are. [Read more 🡒]
Arizona Just Unveiled A Brutal Nonconference Path For Another Deep Run
Arizonas path to another deep run is already taking shape, and it looks every bit as demanding as youd expect from a program trying to stay on the national stage. The Wildcats have unveiled a 17-game nonconference schedule loaded with marquee stops and plenty of chances to be tested early, from a trip to the Maui Invitational to neutral-site games against UCLA in Las Vegas, St. Johns at Madison Square Garden and Arkansas in Phoenix. There are also 10 home dates at McKale Center, plus a regular-season opener against Cal Poly before Big 12 play arrives in early January.
The real value of a slate like this is that it gives Arizona very little room to coast before league play begins. The Maui field alone can shape the early tone of the season, and the Wildcats will also get three exhibition games against Division I opponents, a wrinkle made possible by a recent NCAA rule change. For a team with postseason expectations, the schedule is less about easing in and more about finding out quickly whether it has the depth and toughness to handle another long winter. [Read more 🡒]