There was a different kind of energy in Tuscaloosa on Saturday, but not the kind Alabama probably envisioned when it locked in its home-and-home with Florida State back in 2019.
Florida State’s first trip to Bryant-Denny Stadium since 1974 brought a decent crowd in garnet and gold and a game that had its moments. But the matchup never quite delivered the punch both programs might have hoped for when the series was set.
That’s the problem with scheduling so far ahead: by the time the games arrive, the teams you thought you were getting might not be the teams you actually get.
Florida State, once part of the sport’s top tier, has slid hard. A 5-7 season last year was better than the 2-10 campaign before it, and the only real high point over the last two-plus years has been that stunning 31-17 win over Alabama to open the season.
So instead of a showcase game that could boost Alabama’s profile, it ended up feeling more like a routine first down than a deep shot.
The same thing happened with Wisconsin.
That home-and-home wrapped up last year, and while the Badgers remain one of the steadier names in the Big Ten, they dropped off by the time Alabama’s trips to Madison in 2024 and Tuscaloosa last September arrived. Alabama won those games 42-10 and 38-14, respectively. Camp Randall had some energy two years ago, but the football itself never really matched the billing, and last year’s 11 a.m. kickoff in Bryant-Denny didn’t help.
Still, none of that is really the point. The issue is the way college football forces schools to plan these matchups years in advance, long before anyone can know whether they’ll feel like premium games or just decent placeholders.
Alabama athletics director Greg Byrne addressed that reality before kickoff Saturday, and he explained why the schedule has become such a moving target.
The school had built a plan to add two Power 4 non-conference games to future schedules beginning in 2025, with Florida State and Wisconsin part of that setup. Then the SEC voted to add a ninth conference game starting in 2026, and that changed everything. Home-and-homes with West Virginia and Oklahoma State had to be removed from future schedules to make room.
That left fewer openings to fill, and Byrne made it clear he doesn’t see a clean solution if schools are left to sort it out on their own.
“You’re at the mercy of saying, well, you may not have many options,” Byrne said. “So, I don’t. I’m not really optimistic that you could do it sooner.”
Byrne also pushed back on the idea that Florida State’s recent downturn should somehow count against Alabama when the College Football Playoff committee is weighing resumes.
He pointed to his time on the NCAA men’s basketball tournament selection committee, where he has spent the last five years, and said he believes the same broad logic can apply.
“We noticed when people had an intent on scheduling,” Byrne said. “OK, if they played teams that have had some historic success but maybe were down a year or two, we recognized there was an effort there.”
That idea matters in Alabama’s case because the Crimson Tide still made the 12-team playoff field last season despite a 14-point loss to a 5-7 Florida State team and the Wisconsin win. Those games weren’t the ones driving the December conversation; Alabama’s SEC work carried more weight.
Byrne said the committee should still acknowledge the intent behind the schedule.
“Last year, maybe Wisconsin didn’t have their best team they’ve ever had, but there was still an intent to schedule the historically strong program and, and we got in the playoff,” Byrne said. “And that, I feel strongly that should be recognized.”
He also suggested that playing Big Ten and ACC opponents helped Alabama in the eyes of the committee.
“I think if we would have scheduled a group of six, lower-level group of six team instead of them, we probably should have been penalized for it.”
That’s a hard thing to prove in a vacuum, especially when the committee’s appetite for schedule strength has not always lined up with the way it talks about it. Why, for example, would defending national champ Indiana open with North Texas, Howard (FCS) and Western Kentucky?
Even so, Alabama deserves credit for being aggressive about the way it has built its non-conference slate. Those home-and-homes added value and gave fans a more appealing product than a routine lower-tier visitor would have.
And in a league that already requires every SEC team to play at least one Power 4 opponent annually, Alabama had two on the schedule before the conference moved to nine league games.
If there were a way to delay these decisions until closer to kickoff, the sport would probably benefit. The fan experience would, too. Florida State and Wisconsin were fine opponents, but neither series ended up carrying the kind of national weight Alabama might have hoped for when those deals were made.
For now, though, the next few home-and-homes on Alabama’s calendar look a lot sturdier.
The Crimson Tide is set to face Ohio State in 2027 and 2028 before Notre Dame arrives in 2029 and 2030.
In Other News...
Bryant-Denny Just Gave Alabama Fans A New Gameday Price Debate
Bryant-Denny Stadiums concession stands can make even a routine snack feel like part of the bigger gameday experience, and the Burnt End Nachos are a good example of how Alabama fans are now weighing taste against the kind of price tag that comes with eating inside a major venue. The review of the item found a decent portion and a familiar enough lineup of ingredients, but also noted that the same dish carries a much friendlier price at a local restaurant than it does under the stadium lights.
For fans filing through Tuscaloosa on Saturdays, the real debate is less about whether the nachos are enjoyable and more about whether they justify nearly $20 before tax for what is still, at the end of the day, a plate of stadium food. Thats the tradeoff Alabama supporters keep running into on game day: convenience, atmosphere, and a specialty menu item, all wrapped into one purchase that leaves the taste buds satisfied but the receipt hard to ignore. [Read more 🡒]
Keelon Russell Just Entered A Bigger SEC Conversation
Rece Davis used his latest look around the SEC to put a spotlight on the leagues next wave of quarterbacks, and Alabamas Keelon Russell was right in the middle of it. As Davis sized up the conference heading into Week 4, he said Ole Miss remained his top team, but he also singled out four young passers who have already started to change the way their teams are viewed.
Russells inclusion matters because it keeps Alabama in the center of the SEC conversation even as other programs try to build momentum behind emerging quarterbacks like Tennessees Faizon Brandon, Vanderbilts Jared Curtis and Mississippi States Kamario Taylor. For Alabama, it is another sign that the Tides future at the position is drawing real attention, and that Russell is already being discussed alongside some of the leagues most promising young talents. [Read more 🡒]
Alabama Pass Rush Has A New Difference-Maker Entering SEC Play
Through the first three games, Devan Thompkins has already become one of the more important additions on Alabamas defensive front. The USC transfer leads the Crimson Tide with three sacks, and his impact has shown up in more than just the stat sheet. Against Kentucky and Florida State, he gave Alabama a needed presence off the edge while also showing the versatility and poise the staff has come to lean on as SEC play begins.
Now the challenge gets a little more demanding, with South Carolina next on the schedule and Alabama looking for Thompkins to keep setting the tone up front. For a defense that wants to disrupt timing and force offenses into uncomfortable spots, his role only gets bigger from here. The early returns have been strong, but the next stretch will show how much of a difference-maker he can be when the competition tightens. [Read more 🡒]