With the Steelers and Saints preparing for the NFL’s first regular-season game in Paris on Sunday, the matchup has become about more than football. Ongoing protests and riots across France have prompted fresh concern about whether the league should stick with the plan at all.
Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk is one of the loudest voices pushing for a change. He wants the NFL to move the game to London, arguing that even if Stade de France is secure, the larger issue is whether fans can safely be in Paris right now.
Unrest in France has been building since mid-September, when high school students began protesting the state of education. The demonstrations have since widened to include anger over the cost of living and rising fuel prices. Last weekend, the situation escalated into what The Athletic described as the most violent riots the country has seen in decades, with nearly 2,400 arrests.
The fallout has already reached the sports world. More than 70,000 police officers are being deployed around France this weekend, Paris Saint-Germain’s Ligue 1 match against Lyon was pushed back a day, and the Steelers have canceled their fan event in the Bastille neighborhood. The NFL has also shut down its “NFL House” event in Paris.
On Friday, President Donald Trump also weighed in, saying the league could have delayed the game.
“I would have said the NFL could have probably postponed that match, if you want to know, because France is really in trouble,” Trump said.
Florio took that argument a step further in a Saturday column, writing that the league “shouldn’t wait one hour more to relocate the game.”
“No matter how safe and secure Stade de France will be for the game, it’s not safe for NFL fans to be in Paris due to protests that from time to time morph into full-blown riots,” Florio wrote, via Pro Football Talk.
He also pointed to a security alert from the U.S. State Department telling Americans in town for the game to “exercise caution and be aware of their surroundings.”
Florio’s point was simple: if fans still have to move around the city to attend the game, the danger doesn’t disappear just because the stadium itself is heavily protected.
“Why would the NFL insist on pressing forward? The risk, however big or small it may be, isn’t worth it,” Florio wrote.
He added that security personnel being used in support of the game could be deployed elsewhere in the city instead. And if the NFL refuses to move the contest to London, Florio suggested French authorities should push it back to Monday, the same way PSG’s match was shifted.
“It’s surprising that it’s gotten to this point. The warning signs have been obvious for weeks,” Florio wrote. “And if there’s even one incident in connection with playing the game as planned, the NFL will risk being dubbed what the French call les incompétents.”
In Other News...
Steelers Defense Faces A Bigger Saints Test Than Fans Realize
The Steelers defense has earned some breathing room after a sharper stretch under coordinator Patrick Graham, with the unit giving up only two passing touchdowns and snagging three interceptions over the last three games. But the next test is a different kind of challenge, because New Orleans comes in with Tyler Shough piloting an offense that has been more productive through the air than many expected, especially when he is able to find Chris Olave in rhythm.
Pittsburghs margin for error could also be thinner in the secondary. Brandin Echols is out with a hamstring injury, and Jalen Ramsey is working through a wrist issue, leaving the Steelers to sort out how much they can lean on their recent improvement against a Saints passing game that has already shown real efficiency entering Week 7. [Read more 🡒]
Steelers Face A Risky Alex Highsmith Decision They May Regret
The trade deadline always tends to expose where a roster is thin, and Pittsburgh is once again in that familiar spot. According to Daniel Popper of The Athletic, the Steelers front office is weighing a player-for-player deal involving outside linebacker Alex Highsmith, a move that would force the team to balance immediate defensive value against longer-term roster needs elsewhere.
Highsmith has been one of the Steelers most productive edge players, which is why any talk of moving him carries real risk. Pittsburgh is also trying to sort out help in the secondary and at wide receiver, so the temptation to use a major asset to address another hole is obvious, even if the timing ahead of the Nov. 10 deadline makes the decision especially delicate. [Read more 🡒]
Steelers Face A Tough Trade Deadline Call On Their Offensive Line
The trade deadline is still a moving target for Pittsburgh, but one of the quieter questions on the table is whether the Steelers should go after help on the offensive line. Guard usually does not dominate the deadline conversation, yet it is a spot worth monitoring if the front office decides the line needs a sturdier finish for the stretch run, especially with a player out there who has long been regarded as one of the leagues best at the position.
The challenge is less about talent than everything wrapped around it. A move of that magnitude would force Pittsburgh to weigh fit, money and what kind of draft capital it is willing to surrender for a short- and long-term upgrade. No deal has been reported, and no negotiations have been made public, but the Steelers are at least staring at a familiar deadline dilemma: address a need now, or hold onto the resources and trust the roster as built. [Read more 🡒]