Cavs TV Deal Just Sparked A Debate Fans Will Feel

Amidst fan backlash, Ken Carman raises concerns over the Cleveland Cavaliers' accessible DAZN TV deal and its impact on viewer engagement this season.

Ken Carman isn’t sold on the Cavaliers’ new TV setup, and he’s not pretending otherwise.

The 92.3 The Fan host took aim at Cleveland’s broadcast arrangement with DAZN on Thursday morning, arguing that the price and the extra hoops to watch the team could leave some fans behind as the season gets rolling.

“How am I supposed to sit here and talk about the Cavs when nobody’s going to watch them?”

Carman said he would pay to watch the team, but his bigger point was about everybody else. In his view, the issue isn’t whether one committed fan buys in. It’s whether enough people do.

“It’s bad for the fanbase,” Carman said.

That complaint lands in the middle of a very specific business reality. Some fans will swallow the added cost and keep watching.

Others, especially those who used to catch games more casually, may decide it’s not worth the extra subscription. Carman’s remarks point to that risk, but they do not prove the Cavs have already lost viewers.

For local fans trying to figure out the numbers, the Cavs’ broadcast page lists four DAZN choices. There’s a standard monthly plan at $19.99, a monthly Ultimate plan at $24.99, a season pass at $119.99, and a season pass Ultimate at $139.99.

The standard monthly plan includes two simultaneous streams at one location. The Ultimate monthly plan allows five simultaneous streams at two locations. The season versions mirror those stream limits.

If someone stays subscribed all season, the math gets tight. Six months at the standard rate comes to $119.94, which is just five cents under the season pass. Keep it going for a seventh month, and the total jumps to $139.93.

But the price tag is only part of the puzzle. DAZN carries the Cavs’ locally available games, yet it does not include games pulled for exclusive national broadcasts. So even a season pass doesn’t mean one subscription covers the entire schedule.

Cleveland’s 2026-27 slate already shows that split. The Oct. 22 opener at Philadelphia is on ESPN, the Nov. 2 meeting with Oklahoma City is on Peacock, and the Nov. 6 game against Philadelphia is on Prime Video.

That means fans still have to track which service has which game, especially if they already pay for one or more national platforms. A monthly purchase may make more sense for the occasional viewer, while the season pass becomes the better value for someone planning to watch all year.

The Cavaliers and DAZN announced in September that 15 games will be available free. The team also said full-season and half-season Cavs United and Foundation members will receive complimentary subscriptions.

The partnership was also framed as a production upgrade. Rock Entertainment Sports Network will handle broadcasts in-house, and the setup includes an expanded 19-camera system.

Nic Barlage, CEO of Rock Entertainment Group, the Cavaliers and Rocket Arena, said the goal was “simplifying how fans connect to Cavaliers basketball”

That’s the promise on the broadcast side. Carman’s gripe is simpler: even with improved production, fans still have to pay more and navigate more services to follow the team.

In Other News...

Cavs Opening Night Collapse Raises An Ugly Early Question

The Cavaliers looked ready to put a bow on Opening Night with a runaway first half against Philadelphia, leaning on a strong start that had them up by 29 points before the game completely flipped. Instead, the Sixers took over after the break and turned what had felt like a comfortable season opener into an immediate reminder that early leads do not mean much if a team cannot sustain its edge.

For Cleveland, the most promising part of the night may have been the play of Mario Hezonja, whose return to the NBA gave the lineup a jolt on both ends even as the finish went sideways. The bigger concern is harder to ignore: when Philadelphia tightened the screws, the Cavaliers frontcourt stopped producing enough to keep control, leaving an ugly early question hanging over a roster that expected a far smoother start. [Read more 🡒]

Evan Mobley Reignited A Cavs Concern Fans Know Too Well

The Cavaliers season opener followed a familiar pattern for a team trying to take the next step, with a solid first-half performance giving way to a loss after the lead slipped away in the second half. Evan Mobley was central to the early surge, giving Cleveland a much-needed lift on offense while still serving as the defensive anchor the club leans on so heavily.

Mobleys value on that end has never been in doubt, but the bigger question remains how often he can keep his offense engaged when the game tightens. For a Cavs team that needs more from him than rim protection and the occasional burst, the opener only sharpened the focus on whether he can bring the same presence across all four quarters. [Read more 🡒]

Cavs Need To Stop Putting The Wrong Burden On Donovan Mitchell

Donovan Mitchell has never needed much help proving he can score, and that is still the clearest way for the Cavaliers to get the most out of him. The issue is not whether he can make plays for others, but whether Cleveland is asking him to spend too much time doing it when his best value comes from attacking as a scorer and forcing defenses to react to him.

The guard rotation should be built around preserving that focus, with the ball-handling load leaning more heavily on others so Mitchell can stay in his preferred lane. His assist totals can look useful on the surface, but they are often more a byproduct of how the game unfolds than evidence that the Cavaliers are best served by making him the organizer every night. [Read more 🡒]